Skip to content
OpenCapital
Get started

AES AES EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin at other companies

Nextra Energy logo
Nextra EnergyNEE
54.6%+1.7pp
Duke Energy logo
Duke EnergyDUK
49.8%+3.1pp
Quanta Services logo
Quanta ServicesPWR
8.9%0.0pp
Argan logo
ArganAGX
15.1%+3.3pp
CMS
CMS EnergyCMS
34.6%-1.7pp
Entergy logo
EntergyETR
47.3%+9.3pp

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$3.2B+8.7%
Gross profit$640.0M+45.1%
Net income$487.0M+959%
EPS (diluted)$0.68+871%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$2.3B-9.6%
Total debt$1.2B+17.8%
Total equity$4.4B+27.5%
Total assets$52.8B+8.6%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$1.2B+120%
CapEx$1.8B+40.8%
Free cash flow-$565.0M+20.3%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$10.43B+13.6%
P/E7.7×+0.6×
P/S0.8×+0.1×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin19.3%+1.7pp
Net margin10.8%+0.2pp
FCF margin-11.8%-4.4pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity34.3%-6.4pp
Debt / equity0.3×0.0×
Current ratio0.7×-0.1×

Where this comes from

Calculated from AES’s reported figures.

ebitda/total revenue=27.2%

Based on trailing twelve months.

The official record: AES’s 10-Q, filed November 4, 2025, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about AES's ebitda margin.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is AES's EBITDA margin?
AES (AES) reported EBITDA margin of 27.2% in Q3 2025.
What is the long-term trend for AES's EBITDA margin?
Over 3 years (2020 to 2024), AES's EBITDA margin has grown at a 3.4% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 26.9% to 29.7%.
What does EBITDA margin mean?
Operating cash profitability per sales dollar, before interest, taxes, and non-cash charges.
How do you interpret EBITDA margin?
Useful for comparing operating profitability across firms with different depreciation policies and leverage. High EBITDA margin alongside heavy capex can still mean weak free cash flow — pair it with FCF margin.
How does EBITDA margin compare across companies?
Widely used to compare capital-intensive businesses on a like-for-like basis. Less meaningful for banks and insurers.