Skip to content

Aramark ARMK Impairment Charges

Impairment Charges at other companies

Acuity Brands logo
Acuity BrandsAYI
$4.18M
Dominion Energy logo
Dominion EnergyD
-$39M-185%
Dominion Energy logo
Dominion EnergyD
$291M-25.0%
Newmont logo
NewmontNEM
$210.5M+979%
GameStop logo
GameStopGME
-$4.6M-113%
Hyatt Hotels logo
Hyatt HotelsH
$21M+425%

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$4.9B+14.7%
Gross profit$426.4M+18.6%
Operating income$219.7M+26.2%
Net income$102.0M+64.8%
EPS (diluted)$0.38+65.2%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$540.8M-44.5%
Total debt$6.5B-10.8%
Total equity$3.3B+8.6%
Total assets$13.8B+2.6%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow-$782.2M-33.2%
CapEx$101.3M-12.5%
Free cash flow-$904.4M-27.9%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$14.02B+37.3%
Enterprise value$20B+19.3%
P/E39.3×+9.9×
P/S0.7×+0.1×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin8.4%-0.1pp
Operating margin4.3%-0.1pp
Net margin1.8%-0.1pp
FCF margin1.2%

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity11.3%-0.4pp
Debt / equity-0.4×
Current ratio1.2×0.0×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by Aramark in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept us-gaap:AssetImpairmentCharges.

The official record: Aramark’s 10-Q, filed February 10, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Aramark's impairment charges.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Aramark's impairment charges?
Aramark (ARMK) reported impairment charges of $6.06M in Q4 2025.
What does impairment charges mean?
A non-cash write-down of asset values that are no longer expected to generate their original projected returns.
How do you interpret impairment charges?
An increase signals potential overvaluation of past acquisitions or deteriorating asset performance, which may negatively impact future earnings.
How does impairment charges compare across companies?
Rare for stable companies; frequent or large charges are often viewed negatively by investors as a sign of poor capital allocation.