Skip to content

Bally's BALY Bally's Intralot B2B — Impairment Charges

Other segment segments

Casinos & Resorts
$0
North America Interactive
$0

Similar metrics at other companies

The J.M. Smucker Company logo
SJMImpairment Charges
$507.5M-36.1%
Citigroup logo
CImpairment Charges
$136M+134%
Atlassian logo
TEAMImpairment Charges
$53.64M
KLA Corporation logo
KLACImpairment Charges
$0
Verizon Communications logo
VZImpairment Charges
$0
Estee Lauder Companies Inc. logo
ELImpairment Charges
$0

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$755.7M+105%
Operating income$91.6M+5,161%
Net income-$161.9M-569%
EPS (diluted)-$2.69-572%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$653.4M+183%
Total debt$6.8B+23.0%
Total equity$791.3M-0.6%
Total assets$10.9B+45.9%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow-$145.0M-445%
CapEx$38.9M+27.6%
Free cash flow-$183.9M-1,693%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$707.8M+45.9%
Enterprise value$6.88B+18.6%
P/S0.2×-0.1×

Profitability

See full
Operating margin-4.2%-1.4pp
Net margin-25.3%+31.2pp
FCF margin-12%

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity-144%-434pp
Debt / equity8.6×+1.7×
Current ratio1.1×+0.4×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by Bally's in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept us-gaap:GoodwillImpairmentLoss.

The official record: Bally's’s 10-K/A, filed April 20, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Bally's's bally's intralot b2b — impairment charges.

Connect your AI assistant and compare segments, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Bally's's bally's intralot B2B — impairment charges?
Bally's (BALY) reported bally's intralot B2B — impairment charges of $72.5M in Q4 2025.
How has Bally's's bally's intralot B2B — impairment charges changed year-over-year?
Bally's's bally's intralot B2B — impairment charges increased by 304.8% year-over-year, from $17.91M to $72.5M.
What does bally's intralot B2B — impairment charges mean?
Represents the non-cash expense recognized when the carrying value of an asset or reporting unit exceeds its fair market value. This charge reflects a downward revision in the expected future economic benefits derived from the segment's assets.