Skip to content

EV / EBITDA at other companies

Constellation Brands logo
Constellation BrandsSTZ
10.9×
Keurig Dr Pepper logo
Keurig Dr PepperKDP
10.1×-8.8×
Monster Beverage logo
Monster BeverageMNST
27.1×-1.3×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$912.0M+2.0%
Gross profit$571.0M+11.3%
Operating income$96.0M-53.2%
Net income$54.0M-63.0%
EPS (diluted)$0.12-61.3%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$308.0M-33.5%
Total debt$2.3B-20.3%
Total equity$4.0B+0.7%
Total assets$7.9B-2.4%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$291.0M+91.4%
CapEx$26.0M-48.0%
Free cash flow$265.0M+160%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$12.22B-26.0%
Enterprise value$14.18B-25.0%
P/E17.1×-1.9×
P/S3.1×-1.0×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin60.5%+1.6pp
Operating margin25.5%-2.4pp
Net margin18.2%-3.7pp
FCF margin22.7%+11.9pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity17.8%-5.3pp
Debt / equity0.6×-0.1×
Current ratio3.2×-0.6×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Brown-Forman Corporation’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Brown-Forman Corporation’s 10-K, filed June 12, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Brown-Forman Corporation's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Brown-Forman Corporation's EV / EBITDA?
Brown-Forman Corporation (BF.A) reported EV / EBITDA of 12.8× in Q1 2026.
How has Brown-Forman Corporation's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Brown-Forman Corporation's EV / EBITDA decreased by 18.0% year-over-year, from 15.6× to 12.8×.
What is the long-term trend for Brown-Forman Corporation's EV / EBITDA?
Over 5 years (2021 to 2026), Brown-Forman Corporation's EV / EBITDA has grown at a -14.7% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 28.3× to 12.8×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.