Brighthouse Financial BHF Funding agreements classified as investment contracts — Policyholder Account Balance

Other product segments

Similar metrics at other companies

KKRFunding Agreements — Policyholder Account Balance

$12.3B+48.2%

VOYANon-puttable funding agreement — Policyholder Account Balance

$2.25B+60.8%

PRURetirement — Policyholder Account Balance

$20.83B+27.5%

KKROther — Policyholder Account Balance

$11.8B+24.8%

CIASupplemental Contracts Without Life Contingencies — Policyholder Account Balance

$92.64M+29.8%

KKRInsurance — Policyholder Account Balance

$150.29B+5.9%

FAQ

What is Brighthouse Financial's funding agreements classified as investment contracts — policyholder account balance?

Brighthouse Financial (BHF) reported funding agreements classified as investment contracts — policyholder account balance of $9.13B in Q2 2026.

How has Brighthouse Financial's funding agreements classified as investment contracts — policyholder account balance changed year-over-year?

Brighthouse Financial's funding agreements classified as investment contracts — policyholder account balance decreased by 10.3% year-over-year, from $10.17B to $9.13B.

What is the long-term trend for Brighthouse Financial's funding agreements classified as investment contracts — policyholder account balance?

Over 3 years (2022 to 2025), Brighthouse Financial's funding agreements classified as investment contracts — policyholder account balance has grown at a 1.9% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from $37.46B to $39.67B.

What does funding agreements classified as investment contracts — policyholder account balance mean?

This metric represents the total policyholder account balance associated with institutional funding agreements that are accounted for as investment contracts rather than insurance contracts. These agreements typically involve the issuance of debt-like instruments to institutional investors, providing the company with a source of capital to be invested in spread-based assets. It serves as a key indicator of the scale of the company's institutional spread business and its ability to generate net investment income through asset-liability management.