Skip to content

EV / EBITDA at other companies

Pfizer logo
PfizerPFE
12.9×
Johnson & Johnson logo
Johnson & JohnsonJNJ
18.8×+4.2×
Merck & Co. logo
Merck & Co.MRK
23.1×+11.7×
Incyte logo
IncyteINCY
-28.2×
Gilead Sciences logo
Gilead SciencesGILD
17.5×-0.7×
Neurocrine Biosciences logo
Neurocrine BiosciencesNBIX
16.4×-5.2×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$11.5B+2.6%
Gross profit$8.1B-1.2%
Net income$2.7B+9.0%
EPS (diluted)$1.31+9.2%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$9.6B-12.0%
Total debt$44.7B-10.5%
Total equity$20.1B+15.4%
Total assets$86.5B-6.4%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$1.1B-43.5%
CapEx$347.0M+33.5%
Free cash flow$757.0M-55.3%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$112.89B-0.2%
Enterprise value$147.97B-2.6%
P/E15.5×-5.6×
P/S2.3×0.0×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin70.5%0.0pp
Net margin15%+3.8pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity38.8%+7.3pp
Debt / equity2.2×-0.6×
Current ratio1.4×+0.1×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Bristol-Myers Squibb’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Bristol-Myers Squibb’s 10-Q, filed April 30, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Bristol-Myers Squibb's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Bristol-Myers Squibb's EV / EBITDA?
Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) reported EV / EBITDA of 12× in Q1 2026.
How has Bristol-Myers Squibb's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Bristol-Myers Squibb's EV / EBITDA increased by 3.5% year-over-year, from 11.6× to 12×.
What is the long-term trend for Bristol-Myers Squibb's EV / EBITDA?
Over 4 years (2021 to 2025), Bristol-Myers Squibb's EV / EBITDA has grown at a -16.7% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 88.5× to 42.7×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.