Skip to content

Bruker BRKR Debt-to-equity

Debt-to-equity at other companies

Thermo Fisher Scientific logo
Thermo Fisher ScientificTMO
0.8×+0.1×
Danaher logo
DanaherDHR
0.4×0.0×
TEC
Bio-TechneTECH
0.1×-0.1×
WAT
Waters CorporationWAT
0.3×-0.4×
Agilent Technologies logo
Agilent TechnologiesA
0.5×-0.1×
Revvity logo
RevvityRVTY
0.5×+0.1×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$823.4M+2.7%
Gross profit$379.8M-2.9%
Operating income$10.2M-67.9%
Net income$14.4M-17.2%
EPS (diluted)$0.02-81.8%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$137.6M-26.7%
Total debt$1.7B-20.9%
Total equity$2.5B+34.6%
Total assets$6.1B+3.3%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$71.2M+9.5%
CapEx$24.2M-6.9%
Free cash flow$47.0M+20.5%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$8.71B-13.2%
Enterprise value$10.25B-14.9%
P/S2.5×-0.4×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin45.3%-3.7pp
Operating margin1.3%-5.0pp
Net margin-0.6%-10.0pp
FCF margin1.5%-3.6pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity-1%-21.2pp
Current ratio1.6×0.0×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Bruker’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Bruker’s 10-Q, filed May 7, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Bruker's debt-to-equity.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Bruker's debt-to-equity?
Bruker (BRKR) reported debt-to-equity of 0.7× in Q1 2026.
How has Bruker's debt-to-equity changed year-over-year?
Bruker's debt-to-equity decreased by 41.3% year-over-year, from 1.2× to 0.7×.
What is the long-term trend for Bruker's debt-to-equity?
Over 5 years (2020 to 2025), Bruker's debt-to-equity has grown at a -2.5% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 1× to 0.8×.
What does debt-to-equity mean?
How much debt the company carries for every dollar of shareholder equity.
How do you interpret debt-to-equity?
Lower is generally safer, but moderate leverage can boost returns. Read in the context of cash-flow stability — a utility tolerates more debt than a cyclical. Negative equity makes the ratio meaningless and it is suppressed there.
How does debt-to-equity compare across companies?
Comparable within an industry; capital structures differ sharply across sectors. Not meaningful for banks.