Skip to content

Corebridge Financial CRBG Financing receivable, nonperforming to outstanding (as a percent)

Financing receivable, nonperforming to outstanding (as a percent) at other companies

Ares Capital logo
Ares CapitalARCC
1.8%+0.1pp
Stifel Financial logo
Stifel FinancialSF
100%0.0pp
FBR
Franklin BSP Realty TrustFBRT
$60.3M
Popular logo
PopularBPOP
Popular logo
PopularBPOP
Popular logo
PopularBPOP

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$4.0B+11.0%
Net income-$53.0M+92.0%
EPS (diluted)-$0.11+90.8%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$373.0M-5.1%
Total debt$11.2B-17.2%
Total equity$10.8B-9.8%
Total assets$407.06B+4.4%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow-$9.0M-102%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$13.33B-37.9%
P/S0.7×-0.6×

Profitability

See full
Net margin5.4%

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity7.3%
Debt / equity0.9×-0.3×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by Corebridge Financial in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept crbg:FinancingReceivableNonperformingToOutstandingPercent.

The official record: Corebridge Financial’s 10-Q, filed May 6, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Corebridge Financial's financing receivable, nonperforming to outstanding (as a percent).

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Corebridge Financial's financing receivable, nonperforming to outstanding (as a percent)?
Corebridge Financial (CRBG) reported financing receivable, nonperforming to outstanding (as a percent) of 1% in Q1 2026.
What is the long-term trend for Corebridge Financial's financing receivable, nonperforming to outstanding (as a percent)?
Over 2 years (2023 to 2025), Corebridge Financial's financing receivable, nonperforming to outstanding (as a percent) has grown at a 0.0% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 1% to 1%.
What does financing receivable, nonperforming to outstanding (as a percent) mean?
The percentage of total loans that are currently in default or significantly past due.
How do you interpret financing receivable, nonperforming to outstanding (as a percent)?
Lower is better; an increasing ratio signals deteriorating credit quality and potential future write-offs.
How does financing receivable, nonperforming to outstanding (as a percent) compare across companies?
A standard credit quality metric used across all financial institutions with lending operations.