Skip to content

CoStar Group CSGP EV / EBITDA

EV / EBITDA at other companies

Moody's logo
Moody'sMCO
21.3×-5.1×
MSCI logo
MSCIMSCI
25.1×-5.4×
Regency Centers logo
Regency CentersREG
22.1×-1.9×
Realty Income logo
Realty IncomeO
11.6×+0.1×
Prologis logo
PrologisPLD
20.8×-2.5×
CBRE Group logo
CBRE GroupCBRE
17.9×-3.6×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$897.0M+22.5%
Gross profit$701.0M+21.1%
Operating income$3.0M+107%
Net income$3.0M+120%
EPS (diluted)$0.01+125%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$1.3B-65.2%
Total debt$1.1B+1.9%
Total equity$7.9B-7.5%
Total assets$10.2B-2.5%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$152.0M+187%
CapEx$45.0M-16.7%
Free cash flow$107.0M+10,800%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$12.3B-49.3%
Enterprise value$12.13B-45.5%
P/E496×+289×
P/S3.6×-5.0×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin78.6%-1.1pp
Operating margin-2.7%-3.9pp
Net margin0.7%-3.4pp
FCF margin6.9%

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity0.3%-1.2pp
Debt / equity0.1×0.0×
Current ratio2.2×-3.8×

Where this comes from

Calculated from CoStar Group’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: CoStar Group’s 10-Q, filed April 29, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about CoStar Group's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is CoStar Group's EV / EBITDA?
CoStar Group (CSGP) reported EV / EBITDA of 56.5× in Q1 2026.
How has CoStar Group's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
CoStar Group's EV / EBITDA decreased by 69.6% year-over-year, from 185.8× to 56.5×.
What is the long-term trend for CoStar Group's EV / EBITDA?
Over 5 years (2020 to 2025), CoStar Group's EV / EBITDA has grown at a 9.8% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 81.3× to 129.5×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.