Screener
Curtiss-Wright CW Ratios & Valuation
| Q2 '26 | Q1 '26 | Q4 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q2 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profitability | ||||||
| Gross margin | 37.7%+0.4pp | 37.2%+0.1pp | 37.2%+0.2pp | 37.4%+0.4pp | 37.3%0.0pp | |
| Operating margin | 18.8%+1.1pp | 18.4%+1.0pp | 18.1%+1.2pp | 18%+0.6pp | 17.7%+0.4pp | |
| Net margin | 14.8%+1.2pp | 14.2%+0.8pp | 13.8%+0.9pp | 13.8%+0.6pp | 13.7%+0.6pp | |
| Returns | ||||||
| Return on equity | 19.7%+2.3pp | 19.7%+2.3pp | 19.4%+2.5pp | 18.5%+1.1pp | 17.5%+0.4pp | |
| Return on invested capital | 15.5%+2.0pp | 15.1%+1.9pp | 15.1%+2.2pp | 14.2%+1.3pp | 13.5%+1.2pp | |
| Efficiency | ||||||
| Asset turnover | 0.7×0.0× | 0.7×0.0× | 0.7×0.0× | 0.7×0.0× | 0.7×0.0× | |
| Liquidity | ||||||
| Current ratio | 1.6×-0.3× | 1.5×-0.4× | 1.4×-0.3× | 1.8×-0.2× | 1.9×-0.1× | |
| Leverage | ||||||
| Debt-to-equity | 0.4×0.0× | 0.4×0.0× | 0.5×0.0× | 0.4×0.0× | 0.4×-0.1× | |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.8×-0.3× | 1×-0.3× | 1.1×-0.1× | 1.2×+0.1× | 1.1×-0.1× | |
| Per Share | ||||||
| Book value per share | $74.62+4.3% | $71.02+5.0% | $67.33+5.5% | $67.16+3.7% | $71.54+12.0% | |
| Valuation | ||||||
| Market capitalization | $18.93B-8.8% | $25.14B+110% | $20.33B+50.9% | $20.46B+62.5% | $17.94B+72.9% | |
| Price / earnings | 35×-9.6× | 49.2×+21.4× | 42×+8.7× | 44×+13.1× | 39.7×+13.3× | |
| Price / sales | 5.2×-1.0× | 7×+3.2× | 5.8×+1.5× | 6.1×+2.0× | 5.4×+2.0× | |
| Price / book | 6.8×-1.4× | 9.6×+4.9× | 8×+2.5× | 8.1×+3.0× | 6.6×+2.4× | |
| EV / EBITDA | 24.3×-5.5× | 33×+13.8× | 27.9×+5.5× | 29.4×+8.7× | 26.7×+9.1× |
FAQ
- What are Curtiss-Wright's profit margins?
- Curtiss-Wright (CW) runs a 37.7% gross margin and a 18.8% operating margin, with a 14.8% net margin.
- Where do Curtiss-Wright's ratios come from?
- Every ratio is computed from Curtiss-Wright's SEC filings — trailing-twelve-month flows over period-end balances. Valuation multiples combine those fundamentals with market data, recomputed each period. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any ratio for its full history and peer comparisons.
