Skip to content

EBITDA at other companies

Tyson Foods logo
Tyson FoodsTSN
Archer Daniels Midland logo
Archer Daniels MidlandADM
PFG
Performance Food GroupPFGC
BG
BungeBG
International Flavors & Fragrances logo
International Flavors & FragrancesIFF
Middleby logo
MiddlebyMIDD

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$1.6B+12.3%
Gross profit$404.9M+30.1%
Operating income$226.8M+698%
Net income$134.3M+613%
EPS (diluted)$0.83+619%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$116.0M+42.4%
Total debt$4.4B+4.9%
Total equity$4.9B+9.6%
Total assets$10.6B+6.1%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$153.0M-38.6%
CapEx$95.1M+14.4%
Free cash flow$169.8M+34.0%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$8.53B+112%
Enterprise value$12.77B+62.4%
P/E38.2×+14.7×
P/S1.4×+0.6×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin24.8%+2.2pp
Operating margin7.5%+1.1pp
Net margin3.5%+0.5pp
FCF margin11.1%+2.2pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity4.8%+1.0pp
Debt / equity0.9×0.0×
Current ratio1.6×+0.2×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Darling Ingredients Inc.’s reported figures.

$226.8Mebit+
$130.9MDepreciation Depletion & Amortization
=$357.68M

The official record: Darling Ingredients Inc.’s 10-Q, filed May 8, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Darling Ingredients Inc.'s ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Darling Ingredients Inc.'s EBITDA?
Darling Ingredients Inc. (DAR) reported EBITDA of $357.68M in Q1 2026.
How has Darling Ingredients Inc.'s EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Darling Ingredients Inc.'s EBITDA increased by 135.0% year-over-year, from $152.24M to $357.68M.
What is the long-term trend for Darling Ingredients Inc.'s EBITDA?
Over 4 years (2021 to 2025), Darling Ingredients Inc.'s EBITDA has grown at a -10.2% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from $1.2B to $781.94M.
What does EBITDA mean?
Operating cash profit before interest, taxes, and non-cash charges.
How do you interpret EBITDA?
Higher is better and widely used to value capital-intensive businesses, but it ignores the real cost of capex — pair it with free cash flow. (Defined as EBIT + D&A so EBITDA = EBIT + D&A holds exactly.)
How does EBITDA compare across companies?
Standard cross-company operating-profit proxy for non-financials; not meaningful for banks and insurers.