Skip to content

Energy Transfer ET EV / EBITDA

EV / EBITDA at other companies

Williams Companies logo
Williams CompaniesWMB
16.6×+6.3×
Oneok logo
OneokOKE
12×-2.4×
Enterprise Products Partners logo
Enterprise Products PartnersEPD
15.2×+1.1×
Enbridge logo
EnbridgeENB
7.3×-4.8×
EQT Corporation logo
EQT CorporationEQT
6.1×-6.0×
Cheniere Energy Partners logo
Cheniere Energy PartnersCQP
11.5×-0.4×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$27.8B+32.1%
Gross profit$6.6B+21.5%
Operating income$3.0B+19.8%
Net income$1.3B-5.2%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$951.0M+110%
Total debt$71.1B+17.3%
Total assets$147.48B+16.7%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$3.4B+15.8%
CapEx$1.9B+56.5%
Free cash flow$1.5B-13.6%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$64.52B+4.1%
Enterprise value$134.68B+10.2%
P/E14.8×+2.1×
P/S0.7×-0.1×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin25.2%-0.6pp
Operating margin10.3%-1.0pp
Net margin4.7%-1.2pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Current ratio1.2×0.0×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Energy Transfer’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Energy Transfer’s 10-Q, filed May 7, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Energy Transfer's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Energy Transfer's EV / EBITDA?
Energy Transfer (ET) reported EV / EBITDA of 8.9× in Q1 2026.
How has Energy Transfer's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Energy Transfer's EV / EBITDA increased by 3.8% year-over-year, from 8.5× to 8.9×.
What is the long-term trend for Energy Transfer's EV / EBITDA?
Over 4 years (2021 to 2025), Energy Transfer's EV / EBITDA has grown at a 7.3% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 25.2× to 33.4×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.