Skip to content

FormFactor FORM EV / EBITDA

EV / EBITDA at other companies

CoStar Group logo
CoStar GroupCSGP
$120M-7.5%
SBA Communications logo
SBA CommunicationsSBAC
650%0.0pp
Owens Corning logo
Owens CorningOC
$120M-70.5%
FirstEnergy logo
FirstEnergyFE
$7+300%
Jones Lang LaSalle logo
Jones Lang LaSalleJLL
$273.6M+21.7%
PEA
PEAKPEAK

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$226.1M+32.0%
Gross profit$86.8M+34.5%
Operating income$16.6M+409%
Net income$20.4M+218%
EPS (diluted)$0.26+225%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$126.4M-5.1%
Total debt$31.9M-14.9%
Total equity$1.1B+9.6%
Total assets$1.3B+8.6%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$45.0M+91.0%
CapEx$15.2M-18.3%
Free cash flow$29.8M+501%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$11.66B+244%
Enterprise value$11.56B+256%
P/E170.6×+108×
P/S13.9×+9.5×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin39.4%-1.0pp
Operating margin8.4%+2.3pp
Net margin8.1%+1.1pp
FCF margin4.4%-4.1pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity6.8%+1.0pp
Debt / equity0.0×
Current ratio4.5×+0.1×

Where this comes from

Calculated from FormFactor’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: FormFactor’s 10-Q, filed May 5, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about FormFactor's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is FormFactor's EV / EBITDA?
FormFactor (FORM) reported EV / EBITDA of 68.9× in Q1 2026.
How has FormFactor's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
FormFactor's EV / EBITDA increased by 166.7% year-over-year, from 25.8× to 68.9×.
What is the long-term trend for FormFactor's EV / EBITDA?
Over 4 years (2020 to 2025), FormFactor's EV / EBITDA has grown at a 9.7% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 31× to 44.9×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.