Skip to content

GCM Grosvenor Inc. GCMG Clawback obligation

Clawback obligation at other companies

KKR & Co. logo
KKR & Co.KKR
$5.4B+8.0%
The Carlyle Group logo
The Carlyle GroupCG
$102M+129%
Blackstone logo
BlackstoneBX
$311.21M+132%
KKR & Co. logo
KKR & Co.KKR
$0
The Carlyle Group logo
The Carlyle GroupCG
$76.5M+301%
KKR & Co. logo
KKR & Co.KKR
$195M-64.4%

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$124.8M-0.8%
Operating income$20.5M+33.6%
Net income$5.5M+1,081%
EPS (diluted)$0.06+400%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$164.4M+74.0%
Total debt$418.8M-14.2%
Total equity$25.5M+190%
Total assets$688.8M+18.8%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$51.7M+55.5%
CapEx$3.8M+229%
Free cash flow$47.9M+49.2%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$739.69M+29.3%
Enterprise value$994.15M+2.9%
P/E14.7×-18.9×
P/S1.3×+0.3×

Profitability

See full
Operating margin24.9%+5.2pp
Net margin9.1%+5.8pp
FCF margin34.3%+7.1pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity-3,556.3%
Debt / equity16.4×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by GCM Grosvenor Inc. in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept gcm:RevenueRecognitionClawbackObligation.

The official record: GCM Grosvenor Inc.’s 10-K, filed February 19, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about GCM Grosvenor Inc.'s clawback obligation.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is GCM Grosvenor Inc.'s clawback obligation?
GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) reported clawback obligation of $200K in Q4 2025.
How has GCM Grosvenor Inc.'s clawback obligation changed year-over-year?
GCM Grosvenor Inc.'s clawback obligation decreased by 0.0% year-over-year, from $200K to $200K.
What is the long-term trend for GCM Grosvenor Inc.'s clawback obligation?
Over 5 years (2020 to 2025), GCM Grosvenor Inc.'s clawback obligation has grown at a -32.2% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from $1.4M to $200K.
What does clawback obligation mean?
The estimated amount of previously recognized performance fees that the firm may be required to return to investors if future investment performance falls below specified thresholds. This represents a contingent liability inherent in alternative asset management fee structures. It is a vital measure of potential revenue volatility and downside risk.