Skip to content

GE Vernova GEV EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin at other companies

Duke Energy logo
Duke EnergyDUK
49.8%+3.1pp
Entergy logo
EntergyETR
47.3%+9.3pp
Quanta Services logo
Quanta ServicesPWR
8.9%0.0pp
Caterpillar logo
CaterpillarCAT
19.7%-2.9pp
PG&E logo
PG&EPCG
37.6%+2.2pp
CMS
CMS EnergyCMS
34.6%-1.7pp

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$9.3B+16.3%
Gross profit$1.8B+21.2%
Operating income$179.0M+316%
Net income$4.7B+1,768%
EPS (diluted)$17.44+1,816%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$10.2B+25.5%
Total debt$1.2B+18.6%
Total equity$13.9B+61.8%
Total assets$75.6B+46.7%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$5.2B+347%
CapEx$397.0M+113%
Free cash flow$4.8B+391%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$281.85B+182%
Enterprise value$272.88B+196%
P/E30.1×-21.6×
P/S7.2×+4.4×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin19.9%+2.0pp
Operating margin3.9%+1.6pp
Net margin23.8%+18.4pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity83.2%+61.2pp
Debt / equity0.1×0.0×
Current ratio0.9×-0.1×

Where this comes from

Calculated from GE Vernova’s reported figures.

Based on trailing twelve months.

The official record: GE Vernova’s 10-Q, filed April 22, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about GE Vernova's ebitda margin.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is GE Vernova's EBITDA margin?
GE Vernova (GEV) reported EBITDA margin of 6.4% in Q1 2026.
How has GE Vernova's EBITDA margin changed year-over-year?
GE Vernova's EBITDA margin increased by 18.1% year-over-year, from 5.4% to 6.4%.
What does EBITDA margin mean?
Operating cash profitability per sales dollar, before interest, taxes, and non-cash charges.
How do you interpret EBITDA margin?
Useful for comparing operating profitability across firms with different depreciation policies and leverage. High EBITDA margin alongside heavy capex can still mean weak free cash flow — pair it with FCF margin.
How does EBITDA margin compare across companies?
Widely used to compare capital-intensive businesses on a like-for-like basis. Less meaningful for banks and insurers.