Skip to content

Other product segments

Specialty
43%+6.4%
Casualty
29.8%+2.8%
Multiline
23%+17.3%
Property
8.8%+3.5%
Health
2.4%-7.7%

Similar metrics at other companies

Axis Capital Holders logo
AXSInsurance — Year 3
15.3%
United Fire Group logo
UFCSPersonal — Year 3
13.8%+7.6pp
American International Group logo
AIGU.S. Financial Lines — Year 3 (as a percent)
15.7%-0.3pp
Arch Capital Group logo
ACGLThird party claims-made business — Year Three
16.3%0.0pp
Arch Capital Group logo
ACGLMulti-line and other specialty — Year Three
11%0.0pp
CNA Financial logo
CNAOther Professional Liability and Management Liability — Year 3
19.8%+0.6pp

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$189.7M-11.1%
Net income$35.8M+20.7%
EPS (diluted)$1.05+22.1%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$610.2M-5.1%
Total debt$4.7M-92.1%
Total equity$741.2M+11.2%
Total assets$2.3B+5.4%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$37.2M+259%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$533.32M+7.2%
Enterprise value-$72.18M-15.4%
P/E6.6×
P/S0.8×+0.1×

Profitability

See full
Net margin11.5%
FCF margin-46.7%

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity11.5%
Debt / equity-0.1×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by Greenlight Capital RE, Ltd. in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept us-gaap:ShortdurationInsuranceContractsHistoricalClaimsDurationYearThree.

The official record: Greenlight Capital RE, Ltd.’s 10-K, filed March 9, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Greenlight Capital RE, Ltd.'s financial — year 3.

Connect your AI assistant and compare segments, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Greenlight Capital RE, Ltd.'s financial — year 3?
Greenlight Capital RE, Ltd. (GLRE) reported financial — year 3 of 46.4% in Q4 2025.
What does financial — year 3 mean?
This metric tracks the claims development or liability exposure related to the third year of the underwriting cycle. It provides a mid-term view of how loss reserves are maturing and whether initial estimates were conservative or aggressive. This is a key indicator for evaluating the long-term profitability of specific underwriting cohorts.