Skip to content

Garmin GRMN Net debt / EBITDA

Net debt / EBITDA at other companies

Raytheon Technologies logo
Raytheon TechnologiesRTX
2.3×-1.2×
Apple logo
AppleAAPL
0.2×-0.2×
Honeywell International logo
Honeywell InternationalHON
3.7×+0.5×
Teledyne Technologies logo
Teledyne TechnologiesTDY
1.3×-0.6×
Nike logo
NikeNKE
2.3×+1.9×
Alphabet Inc. logo
Alphabet Inc.GOOGL

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$1.8B+14.2%
Gross profit$1.0B+17.8%
Operating income$431.7M+29.7%
Net income$405.1M+21.7%
EPS (diluted)$2.09+21.5%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$2.3B+5.3%
Total debt$167.6M+19.5%
Total equity$9.3B+13.3%
Total assets$11.0B+11.9%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$536.0M+27.4%
CapEx$66.6M+66.3%
Free cash flow$469.4M+23.3%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$45.17B+6.9%
Enterprise value$43.04B+7.0%
P/E26×-2.8×
P/S6.1×-0.5×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin59.1%+0.6pp
Operating margin26.5%+1.2pp
Net margin23.3%+0.5pp
FCF margin19.4%+0.6pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity19.9%+0.9pp
Debt / equity0.0×
Current ratio4.4×+0.3×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Garmin’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Garmin’s 10-Q, filed April 29, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Garmin's net debt / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Garmin's net debt / EBITDA?
Garmin (GRMN) reported net debt / EBITDA of -1× in Q1 2026.
How has Garmin's net debt / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Garmin's net debt / EBITDA increased by 13.2% year-over-year, from -1.1× to -1×.
What is the long-term trend for Garmin's net debt / EBITDA?
Over 5 years (2020 to 2025), Garmin's net debt / EBITDA has grown at a -3.1% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from -1.2× to -1×.
What does net debt / EBITDA mean?
How many years of operating earnings it would take to pay off the company's net debt.
How do you interpret net debt / EBITDA?
Lower is safer; lenders often covenant around 3–4×. A negative value means net cash (more cash than debt), a position of strength. Spikes can reflect a temporary EBITDA dip rather than new borrowing.
How does net debt / EBITDA compare across companies?
A standard leverage yardstick across non-financial sectors; covenant thresholds vary by industry cash-flow stability.