IES Holdings, Inc. IESC Commercial and Industrial — Selling, general and administrative expenses
Other segment segments
Similar metrics at other companies
Other financials
Where this comes from
Reported directly by IES Holdings, Inc. in its filing.
Tagged under the XBRL concept us-gaap:SellingGeneralAndAdministrativeExpense.
The official record: IES Holdings, Inc.’s 10-Q, filed May 1, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →
Ask your AI about IES Holdings, Inc.'s commercial and industrial — selling, general and administrative expenses.
Connect your AI assistant and compare segments, right in your chat.
Connect your AI
Claude
Questions, answered.
- What is IES Holdings, Inc.'s commercial and industrial — selling, general and administrative expenses?
- IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) reported commercial and industrial — selling, general and administrative expenses of $14.75M in Q1 2026.
- How has IES Holdings, Inc.'s commercial and industrial — selling, general and administrative expenses changed year-over-year?
- IES Holdings, Inc.'s commercial and industrial — selling, general and administrative expenses increased by 33.8% year-over-year, from $11.02M to $14.75M.
- What is the long-term trend for IES Holdings, Inc.'s commercial and industrial — selling, general and administrative expenses?
- Over 4 years (2021 to 2025), IES Holdings, Inc.'s commercial and industrial — selling, general and administrative expenses has grown at a 9.0% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from $28.17M to $39.7M.
- What does commercial and industrial — selling, general and administrative expenses mean?
- The overhead costs required to manage and support the commercial and industrial business segment.
- How do you interpret commercial and industrial — selling, general and administrative expenses?
- Rising expenses relative to revenue may indicate administrative bloat or inefficient scaling of the business unit.
- How does commercial and industrial — selling, general and administrative expenses compare across companies?
- Standard SG&A allocation; peers often track this as a percentage of segment revenue to measure operational leverage.