Skip to content

EV / EBITDA at other companies

CBRE Group logo
CBRE GroupCBRE
17.9×-3.6×
CoStar Group logo
CoStar GroupCSGP
56.5×-129×
Prologis logo
PrologisPLD
20.8×-2.5×
Regency Centers logo
Regency CentersREG
22.1×-1.9×
Ladder Capital logo
Ladder CapitalLADR
4.4×+1.6×
W.P. Carey Inc. logo
W.P. Carey Inc.WPC
17.3×-0.9×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$6.4B+11.1%
Operating income$204.6M+70.5%
Net income$159.4M+177%
EPS (diluted)$3.33+192%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$719.3M+11.6%
Total debt$3.6B-11.6%
Total equity$7.3B+6.8%
Total assets$17.9B+7.6%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow-$755.0M+1.6%
CapEx$64.9M+45.8%
Free cash flow-$819.9M-1.0%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$13.79B+21.4%
Enterprise value$16.67B+13.0%
P/E15.4×-5.7×
P/S0.5×0.0×

Profitability

See full
Operating margin4.4%+0.8pp
Net margin3.3%+1.1pp
FCF margin3.6%

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity12.6%+4.4pp
Debt / equity0.5×-0.1×
Current ratio1.1×0.0×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Jones Lang LaSalle’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Jones Lang LaSalle’s 10-Q, filed April 30, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Jones Lang LaSalle's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Jones Lang LaSalle's EV / EBITDA?
Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) reported EV / EBITDA of 12.1× in Q1 2026.
How has Jones Lang LaSalle's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Jones Lang LaSalle's EV / EBITDA decreased by 9.4% year-over-year, from 13.3× to 12.1×.
What is the long-term trend for Jones Lang LaSalle's EV / EBITDA?
Over 5 years (2020 to 2025), Jones Lang LaSalle's EV / EBITDA has grown at a 3.4% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 10.6× to 12.5×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.