Skip to content

EV / EBITDA at other companies

lululemon athletica logo
lululemon athleticaLULU
6.4×-7.3×
TKO Group Holdings logo
TKO Group HoldingsTKO
13.6×-1.2×
Equity Lifestyle Properties logo
Equity Lifestyle PropertiesELS
19.6×-2.2×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$788.7M+11.7%
Gross profit$382.0M+14.0%
Operating income$134.8M+25.2%
Net income$88.1M+15.7%
EPS (diluted)$0.39+14.7%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$150.2M+93.9%
Total debt$4.2B+3.5%
Total equity$3.2B+17.7%
Total assets$8.1B+10.8%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$198.8M+8.1%
CapEx$260.0M+82.5%
Free cash flow-$61.2M-248%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$8.22B-8.7%
Enterprise value$12.22B-4.8%
P/E21.3×-22.1×
P/S2.7×-0.6×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin47.9%+0.7pp
Operating margin16.5%+2.1pp
Net margin12.5%+4.9pp
FCF margin-4%-9.8pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity13%+4.7pp
Debt / equity1.3×-0.2×
Current ratio0.5×+0.1×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Life Time Group Holdings’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Life Time Group Holdings’s 10-Q, filed May 5, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Life Time Group Holdings's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Life Time Group Holdings's EV / EBITDA?
Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) reported EV / EBITDA of 12.3× in Q1 2026.
How has Life Time Group Holdings's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Life Time Group Holdings's EV / EBITDA decreased by 21.4% year-over-year, from 15.6× to 12.3×.
What is the long-term trend for Life Time Group Holdings's EV / EBITDA?
Over 3 years (2022 to 2025), Life Time Group Holdings's EV / EBITDA has grown at a -12.3% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 18.7× to 12.6×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.