Skip to content

EV / EBITDA at other companies

Valero Energy logo
Valero EnergyVLO
13.6×-25.6×
Exxon Mobil logo
Exxon MobilXOM
11.6×+4.3×
Imperial Oil logo
Imperial OilIMO
6.6×+3.6×
Permian Resources logo
Permian ResourcesPR
5.9×+2.3×
Enterprise Products Partners logo
Enterprise Products PartnersEPD
15.2×+1.1×
Chevron logo
ChevronCVX
10.9×+3.6×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$34.2B+8.5%
Gross profit$2.9B+36.3%
Operating income$1.4B+104%
Net income$511.0M+791%
EPS (diluted)$1.73+821%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$2.2B-43.6%
Total debt$1.5B+22.3%
Total equity$16.8B+2.2%
Total assets$88.2B+8.0%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$1.1B+1,852%
CapEx$913.0M+37.7%
Free cash flow$208.0M+129%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$0+58.4%

Profitability

See full
Gross margin10.4%+1.9pp
Operating margin6.7%+2.5pp
Net margin3.4%+1.7pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity27.9%+15.6pp
Debt / equity0.1×0.0×
Current ratio1.2×0.0×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Marathon Petroleum’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Marathon Petroleum’s 10-Q, filed May 5, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Marathon Petroleum's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Marathon Petroleum's EV / EBITDA?
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) reported EV / EBITDA of 5.8× in Q1 2026.
How has Marathon Petroleum's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Marathon Petroleum's EV / EBITDA increased by 22.1% year-over-year, from 4.8× to 5.8×.
What is the long-term trend for Marathon Petroleum's EV / EBITDA?
Over 4 years (2021 to 2025), Marathon Petroleum's EV / EBITDA has grown at a -6.7% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 27× to 20.4×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.