Skip to content

Parker-Hannifin PH EV / EBITDA

EV / EBITDA at other companies

Barnes Group logo
Barnes GroupB
13.2×-2.6×
Emerson Electric logo
Emerson ElectricEMR
17.4×+0.9×
Raytheon Technologies logo
Raytheon TechnologiesRTX
20.5×+1.1×
Woodward logo
WoodwardWWD
28×+9.9×
Honeywell International logo
Honeywell InternationalHON
24.3×+3.0×
Eaton Corporation logo
Eaton CorporationETN
22.7×+3.1×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$5.5B+10.6%
Gross profit$2.0B+10.2%
Net income$904.0M-6.0%
EPS (diluted)$7.06-4.2%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$476.0M+16.5%
Total equity$14.6B+9.1%
Total assets$30.7B+6.1%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$984.0M+56.2%
CapEx$103.0M+17.1%
Free cash flow$881.0M+62.6%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$119.27B+44.4%
P/E34.3×+9.9×
P/S5.7×+1.5×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin37.2%+0.7pp
Net margin16.6%-0.6pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity24.9%-2.3pp
Debt / equity0.7×+0.1×
Current ratio1.1×-0.1×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Parker-Hannifin’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Parker-Hannifin’s 10-Q, filed January 30, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Parker-Hannifin's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Parker-Hannifin's EV / EBITDA?
Parker-Hannifin (PH) reported EV / EBITDA of 24.4× in Q4 2025.
How has Parker-Hannifin's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Parker-Hannifin's EV / EBITDA increased by 29.6% year-over-year, from 18.9× to 24.4×.
What is the long-term trend for Parker-Hannifin's EV / EBITDA?
Over 4 years (2021 to 2025), Parker-Hannifin's EV / EBITDA has grown at a 2.6% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 68.9× to 76.5×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.