Skip to content

Rambus RMBS EV / EBITDA

EV / EBITDA at other companies

Texas Instruments logo
Texas InstrumentsTXN
21.9×-2.6×
Cadence Design Systems logo
Cadence Design SystemsCDNS
41.4×
Synopsys logo
SynopsysSNPS
49.5×+8.4×
Monolithic Power Systems logo
Monolithic Power SystemsMPWR
54.2×+5.3×
Amkor Technology logo
Amkor TechnologyAMKR
9.7×+4.9×
Micron Technology logo
Micron TechnologyMU
10.3×+2.8×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$180.2M+8.1%
Gross profit$143.7M+7.4%
Operating income$61.8M-2.2%
Net income$59.9M-0.7%
EPS (diluted)$0.55-1.8%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$134.3M+1.6%
Total debt$23.4M-19.8%
Total equity$1.4B+20.1%
Total assets$1.5B+11.2%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$83.2M+7.5%
CapEx$11.6M+47.8%
Free cash flow$71.6M+2.9%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$14.07B+67.3%
Enterprise value$13.96B+68.4%
P/E61.2×+20.6×
P/S19.5×+5.6×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin79.5%-0.8pp
Operating margin35.9%+0.2pp
Net margin31.9%-2.3pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity18%-1.2pp
Debt / equity0.0×
Current ratio9.8×-0.3×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Rambus’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Rambus’s 10-Q, filed April 28, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Rambus's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Rambus's EV / EBITDA?
Rambus (RMBS) reported EV / EBITDA of 31.4× in Q1 2026.
How has Rambus's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Rambus's EV / EBITDA increased by 43.5% year-over-year, from 21.9× to 31.4×.
What is the long-term trend for Rambus's EV / EBITDA?
Over 4 years (2021 to 2025), Rambus's EV / EBITDA has grown at a -60.1% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 4,710.7× to 119.3×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.