Raytheon Technologies RTX Ratios & Valuation
| Q1 '26 | Q4 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q1 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profitability | ||||||
| Operating margin | 10.9%+2.7pp | 10.5%+2.4pp | 10.3%+2.4pp | 10%+6.1pp | 8.2%+2.9pp | |
| Net margin | 8%+2.4pp | 7.6%+1.7pp | 7.7%+1.7pp | 7.4%+4.2pp | 5.6%+0.7pp | |
| Returns | ||||||
| Return on equity | 11.4%+3.8pp | 10.7%+2.8pp | 10.5%+3.3pp | 10.1%+6.7pp | 7.5%+2.3pp | |
| Return on invested capital | 8.1%+2.9pp | 7.7%+2.6pp | 7.3%+2.1pp | 6.9%+4.3pp | 5.3%+1.8pp | |
| Efficiency | ||||||
| Asset turnover | 0.5×0.0× | 0.5×0.0× | 0.5×0.0× | 0.5×+0.1× | 0.5×+0.1× | |
| Liquidity | ||||||
| Current ratio | 1×0.0× | 1×0.0× | 1.1×+0.1× | 1×0.0× | 1×-0.1× | |
| Leverage | ||||||
| Debt-to-equity | 0.6×-0.1× | 0.6×-0.1× | 0.6×-0.1× | 0.7×0.0× | 0.7×0.0× | |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.3×-1.2× | 2.4×-1.1× | 2.6×-0.9× | 3.1×-2.3× | 3.4×-1.4× | |
| Valuation | ||||||
| Market capitalization | $259.64B+46.8% | $245.9B+59.6% | $223.98B+38.8% | $189.51B+42.0% | $176.85B+36.4% | |
| Price / earnings | 35.8×-2.7× | 36.5×+4.3× | 34×-0.2× | 30.8×-28.2× | 38.4×+1.2× | |
| Price / sales | 2.9×+0.7× | 2.8×+0.9× | 2.6×+0.6× | 2.3×+0.4× | 2.2×+0.3× | |
| Price / book | 3.9×+1.0× | 3.8×+1.2× | 3.5×+0.8× | 3×+0.8× | 2.9×+0.7× | |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.5×+1.1× | 20.4×+2.8× | 19.6×+0.7× | 18×-6.3× | 19.4×-1.7× | |
| Dividend yield | 1.4%-0.5pp | 1.5%-0.6pp | 1.5%-0.4pp | 1.8%-0.6pp | 1.9%-0.6pp |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- What are Raytheon Technologies's profit margins?
- Raytheon Technologies (RTX) runs a 48.1% gross margin and a 10.9% operating margin, with a 8.0% net margin.
- Where do Raytheon Technologies's ratios come from?
- Every ratio is computed from Raytheon Technologies's SEC filings — trailing-twelve-month flows over period-end balances. Valuation multiples combine those fundamentals with market data, recomputed each period. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any ratio for its full history and peer comparisons.
