Skip to content

EV / EBITDA at other companies

Lowe's Companies logo
Lowe's CompaniesLOW
13.9×+1.2×
Snap-on logo
Snap-onSNA
13.5×+2.2×
Home Depot logo
Home DepotHD
15.5×-1.7×
Dover logo
DoverDOV
16.8×+0.9×
Fastenal logo
FastenalFAST
28.3×+1.8×
Timken logo
TimkenTKR
11.1×+2.4×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$3.8B+2.7%
Gross profit$1.2B+3.3%
Net income$59.6M-34.1%
EPS (diluted)$0.39-35.0%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$344.4M-1.2%
Total debt$6.9B+8.6%
Total equity$9.0B+1.5%
Total assets$21.6B-4.0%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow-$388.8M+7.4%
CapEx$58.5M-10.0%
Free cash flow-$447.3M+7.8%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$13.49B+27.0%
Enterprise value$20.05B+20.1%
P/E36.3×+7.3×
P/S0.9×+0.2×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin30.4%+0.7pp
Net margin2.4%0.0pp
FCF margin4.8%-0.3pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity4.2%0.0pp
Debt / equity0.8×+0.1×
Current ratio1.1×0.0×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Stanley Black & Decker’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Stanley Black & Decker’s 10-Q, filed April 29, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Stanley Black & Decker's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Stanley Black & Decker's EV / EBITDA?
Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) reported EV / EBITDA of 15.1× in Q1 2026.
How has Stanley Black & Decker's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Stanley Black & Decker's EV / EBITDA increased by 19.6% year-over-year, from 12.6× to 15.1×.
What is the long-term trend for Stanley Black & Decker's EV / EBITDA?
Over 4 years (2020 to 2025), Stanley Black & Decker's EV / EBITDA has grown at a -6.4% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 17.7× to 13.6×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.