Screener
Wolverine World Wide WWW Ratios & Valuation
| Q2 '26 | Q1 '26 | Q4 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q2 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profitability | ||||||
| Gross margin | 47.1%+1.3pp | 47.3%+2.6pp | 47.3%+3.0pp | 46.4%+4.1pp | 45.8%+4.6pp | |
| Operating margin | 8.7%+1.3pp | 8.5%+1.6pp | 8%+2.4pp | 7.5%+14.5pp | 7.4%+14.4pp | |
| Net margin | 5.5%+0.9pp | 5.4%+1.3pp | 5.1%+2.5pp | 4.7%+8.5pp | 4.7%+9.1pp | |
| Returns | ||||||
| Return on equity | 27.1%-0.7pp | 28.4%+3.0pp | 26.6%+11.3pp | 25.9%+47.3pp | 27.8%+54.9pp | |
| Return on invested capital | 12.9%+2.2pp | 12.4%+2.6pp | 12.9%+5.3pp | 11.4%+21.4pp | 10.7%+21.0pp | |
| Efficiency | ||||||
| Asset turnover | 1.1×+0.1× | 1.2×+0.2× | 1.1×+0.2× | 1.1×+0.2× | 1×+0.1× | |
| Liquidity | ||||||
| Current ratio | 1.5×+0.3× | 1.5×+0.3× | 1.4×+0.1× | 1.3×+0.1× | 1.3×+0.1× | |
| Leverage | ||||||
| Debt-to-equity | 1.7×-0.8× | 1.9×-0.9× | 1.9×-0.7× | 2.2×-0.8× | 2.5×-1.2× | |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3×-1.5× | 3.5×-1.6× | 3.2×-2.1× | 4.1×— | 4.6×— | |
| Valuation | ||||||
| Market capitalization | $1.58B-26.5% | $1.34B+18.7% | $1.49B-16.3% | $2.23B+60.0% | $1.4B+29.8% | |
| Price / earnings | 14.6×-10.1× | 12.9×-2.7× | 15.5×-23.8× | 25.6×— | 16.4×— | |
| Price / sales | 0.8×-0.4× | 0.7×+0.1× | 0.8×-0.2× | 1.2×+0.4× | 0.8×+0.2× | |
| Price / book | 3.5×-2.2× | 3.2×-0.3× | 3.6×-2.0× | 5.9×+1.2× | 4×-0.1× | |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.2×-5.9× | 10.7×-2.1× | 11.6×-7.9× | 17.6×— | 13.3×— | |
| Dividend yield | 2.1%+0.6pp | 2.5%-0.4pp | 2.2%+0.4pp | 1.5%-0.8pp | 2.4%-0.6pp |
FAQ
- What are Wolverine World Wide's profit margins?
- Wolverine World Wide (WWW) runs a 47.1% gross margin and a 8.7% operating margin, with a 5.5% net margin.
- Where do Wolverine World Wide's ratios come from?
- Every ratio is computed from Wolverine World Wide's SEC filings — trailing-twelve-month flows over period-end balances. Valuation multiples combine those fundamentals with market data, recomputed each period. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any ratio for its full history and peer comparisons.
