Skip to content

Debt-to-equity at other companies

Restaurant Brands International logo
Restaurant Brands InternationalQSR
4.2×-0.9×
Darden Restaurants logo
Darden RestaurantsDRI
3.9×+0.3×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$3.3B+9.7%
Operating income$447.0M+12.0%
Net income$309.0M+5.8%
EPS (diluted)$0.87+13.0%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$473.0M-42.7%
Total debt$2.3B-2.3%
Total equity$5.4B-6.1%
Total assets$10.8B-1.5%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$550.0M+21.7%
CapEx$144.0M+5.1%
Free cash flow$406.0M+28.9%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$14.87B-12.2%
Enterprise value$16.72B-9.9%
P/E15.7×-2.8×
P/S1.2×-0.3×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin24.4%
Operating margin11.1%+0.6pp
Net margin7.8%-0.3pp
FCF margin8.3%+1.8pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity16.9%+1.1pp
Current ratio-0.2×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Yum China Holdings’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Yum China Holdings’s 10-Q, filed May 8, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Yum China Holdings's debt-to-equity.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Yum China Holdings's debt-to-equity?
Yum China Holdings (YUMC) reported debt-to-equity of 0.4× in Q1 2026.
How has Yum China Holdings's debt-to-equity changed year-over-year?
Yum China Holdings's debt-to-equity increased by 4.0% year-over-year, from 0.4× to 0.4×.
What is the long-term trend for Yum China Holdings's debt-to-equity?
Over 5 years (2020 to 2025), Yum China Holdings's debt-to-equity has grown at a 2.5% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 0.4× to 0.4×.
What does debt-to-equity mean?
How much debt the company carries for every dollar of shareholder equity.
How do you interpret debt-to-equity?
Lower is generally safer, but moderate leverage can boost returns. Read in the context of cash-flow stability — a utility tolerates more debt than a cyclical. Negative equity makes the ratio meaningless and it is suppressed there.
How does debt-to-equity compare across companies?
Comparable within an industry; capital structures differ sharply across sectors. Not meaningful for banks.