Skip to content

EV / EBITDA at other companies

KLA Corporation logo
KLA CorporationKLAC
32.8×+13.5×
Lam Research logo
Lam ResearchLRCX
33.9×+17.6×
Entegris logo
EntegrisENTG
24.9×+6.4×
Amkor Technology logo
Amkor TechnologyAMKR
9.7×+4.9×
Teradyne, Inc. logo
Teradyne, Inc.TER
40.9×+23.9×
MKS Instruments logo
MKS InstrumentsMKSI
20.9×+9.9×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$7.9B+11.4%
Gross profit$3.9B+13.3%
Operating income$2.5B+16.3%
Net income$2.8B+31.3%
EPS (diluted)$3.51+33.5%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$1.5B+4.0%
Total debt$7.3B+9.0%
Total equity$23.9B+26.1%
Total assets$40.3B+19.8%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$845.0M-46.2%
CapEx$635.0M+24.5%
Free cash flow$210.0M-80.2%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$470.75B+157%
Enterprise value$476.53B+151%
P/E55.3×+28.2×
P/S16.2×+9.7×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin49%+0.8pp
Operating margin28.6%-1.1pp
Net margin29.3%+5.3pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity39.7%+3.3pp
Debt / equity0.3×0.0×
Current ratio2.5×0.0×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Applied Materials’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Applied Materials’s 10-Q, filed May 21, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Applied Materials's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Applied Materials's EV / EBITDA?
Applied Materials (AMAT) reported EV / EBITDA of 36.3× in Q1 2026.
How has Applied Materials's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Applied Materials's EV / EBITDA increased by 149.4% year-over-year, from 14.5× to 36.3×.
What is the long-term trend for Applied Materials's EV / EBITDA?
Over 4 years (2021 to 2025), Applied Materials's EV / EBITDA has grown at a -1.8% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 76.8× to 71.3×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.