Skip to content

EV / EBITDA at other companies

Applied Materials logo
Applied MaterialsAMAT
36.3×+21.7×
KLA Corporation logo
KLA CorporationKLAC
32.8×+13.5×
Amkor Technology logo
Amkor TechnologyAMKR
9.7×+4.9×
Teradyne, Inc. logo
Teradyne, Inc.TER
40.9×+23.9×
Fortive logo
FortiveFTV
24.7×-10.9×
MACOM Technology Solutions logo
MACOM Technology SolutionsMTSI
643.5×+592×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$291.9M+9.5%
Gross profit$146.4M+2.2%
Operating income$33.5M-46.9%
Net income$33.8M-1.3%
EPS (diluted)$0.67-48.5%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$252.2M+23.8%
Total debt$17.5M+15.3%
Total equity$2.1B+11.1%
Total assets$2.4B+13.3%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$26.3M-71.4%
CapEx$3.6M-56.5%
Free cash flow$22.7M-72.9%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$16.6B+70.5%
P/E121.8×+69.3×
P/S16.1×+6.6×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin48.8%-3.9pp
Operating margin10%-10.2pp
Net margin13.2%-4.9pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity6.7%-3.3pp
Debt / equity0.0×
Current ratio6.2×-2.3×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Onto Innovation’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Onto Innovation’s 10-Q, filed May 5, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Onto Innovation's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Onto Innovation's EV / EBITDA?
Onto Innovation (ONTO) reported EV / EBITDA of 38.8× in Q4 2025.
How has Onto Innovation's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Onto Innovation's EV / EBITDA increased by 20.5% year-over-year, from 32.2× to 38.8×.
What is the long-term trend for Onto Innovation's EV / EBITDA?
Over 2 years (2023 to 2025), Onto Innovation's EV / EBITDA has grown at a -0.0% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 105.7× to 105.6×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.