Skip to content

EV / EBITDA at other companies

Colgate-Palmolive logo
Colgate-PalmoliveCL
19.6×+2.6×
Procter & Gamble logo
Procter & GamblePG
15×-3.6×
Kenvue logo
KenvueKVUE
12.8×-9.3×
Dollar General logo
Dollar GeneralDG
12×-1.4×
General Mills logo
General MillsGIS
8.7×-2.2×
Kimberly-Clark logo
Kimberly-ClarkKMB
11.9×-1.8×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$1.5B+0.2%
Gross profit$681.4M+3.3%
Operating income$291.0M-1.5%
Net income$216.3M-1.7%
EPS (diluted)$0.91+2.3%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$503.4M-53.2%
Total debt$2.4B-1.1%
Total equity$4.2B-8.0%
Total assets$9.0B+0.6%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$174.8M-5.9%
CapEx$31.9M+93.3%
Free cash flow$142.9M-15.5%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$23.08B-18.4%
Enterprise value$24.95B-15.6%
P/E31.5×-17.5×
P/S3.7×-0.9×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin45.1%-0.4pp
Operating margin17.3%+4.2pp
Net margin11.8%+2.3pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity16.8%+3.4pp
Debt / equity0.6×0.0×
Current ratio1.2×-0.7×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Church & Dwight’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Church & Dwight’s 10-Q, filed May 1, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Church & Dwight's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Church & Dwight's EV / EBITDA?
Church & Dwight (CHD) reported EV / EBITDA of 18.7× in Q1 2026.
How has Church & Dwight's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Church & Dwight's EV / EBITDA decreased by 34.0% year-over-year, from 28.4× to 18.7×.
What is the long-term trend for Church & Dwight's EV / EBITDA?
Over 2 years (2021 to 2025), Church & Dwight's EV / EBITDA has grown at a 6.9% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 79.8× to 91.3×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.