Skip to content

EV / EBITDA at other companies

Dollar General logo
Dollar GeneralDG
12×-1.4×
Colgate-Palmolive logo
Colgate-PalmoliveCL
19.6×+2.6×
Kimberly-Clark logo
Kimberly-ClarkKMB
11.9×-1.8×
Johnson & Johnson logo
Johnson & JohnsonJNJ
18.8×+4.2×
Church & Dwight logo
Church & DwightCHD
18.7×-9.6×
Estee Lauder Companies Inc. logo
Estee Lauder Companies Inc.EL
25.6×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$21.2B+7.4%
Gross profit$10.5B+4.3%
Operating income$4.6B+0.4%
Net income$3.9B+4.3%
EPS (diluted)$1.63+5.8%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$12.3B+35.0%
Total debt$23.9B-30.1%
Total assets$128.38B+4.4%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$4.0B+9.2%
CapEx$1.0B+18.6%
Free cash flow$3.0B+6.3%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$350.59B-16.0%
Enterprise value$362.14B-18.2%
P/E21.1×-5.8×
P/S-0.9×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin50.3%-1.0pp
Operating margin23.2%-0.6pp
Net margin19.2%+0.7pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Current ratio0.7×0.0×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Procter & Gamble’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Procter & Gamble’s 10-Q, filed April 24, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Procter & Gamble's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Procter & Gamble's EV / EBITDA?
Procter & Gamble (PG) reported EV / EBITDA of 15× in Q1 2026.
How has Procter & Gamble's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Procter & Gamble's EV / EBITDA decreased by 19.5% year-over-year, from 18.6× to 15×.
What is the long-term trend for Procter & Gamble's EV / EBITDA?
Over 4 years (2021 to 2025), Procter & Gamble's EV / EBITDA has grown at a 1.9% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 68.9× to 74.3×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.