Skip to content

EV / EBITDA at other companies

Keurig Dr Pepper logo
Keurig Dr PepperKDP
10.1×-8.8×
Constellation Brands logo
Constellation BrandsSTZ
10.9×
Coca-Cola logo
Coca-ColaKO
23.2×-4.4×
Church & Dwight logo
Church & DwightCHD
18.7×-9.6×
Starbucks logo
StarbucksSBUX
26.8×+5.2×
General Mills logo
General MillsGIS
8.7×-2.2×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$2.4B+26.9%
Gross profit$1.3B+23.4%
Operating income$730.0M+28.1%
Net income$569.5M+28.5%
EPS (diluted)$0.58+28.9%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$2.0B+7.2%
Total equity$8.7B+33.9%
Total assets$10.8B+31.8%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$605.0M+19.2%
CapEx$20.6M-29.1%
Free cash flow$584.4M+22.1%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$89.64B+24.4%
P/E44.1×-3.6×
P/S10.2×+0.5×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin55.5%+0.8pp
Operating margin29.3%+3.0pp
Net margin23.1%+2.8pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity26.7%+6.7pp
Debt / equity0.0×
Current ratio3.3×-0.1×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Monster Beverage’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Monster Beverage’s 10-Q, filed May 9, 2025, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Monster Beverage's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Monster Beverage's EV / EBITDA?
Monster Beverage (MNST) reported EV / EBITDA of 27.1× in Q1 2025.
How has Monster Beverage's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Monster Beverage's EV / EBITDA decreased by 4.7% year-over-year, from 28.4× to 27.1×.
What is the long-term trend for Monster Beverage's EV / EBITDA?
Over 3 years (2021 to 2024), Monster Beverage's EV / EBITDA has grown at a -0.6% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 103.8× to 101.8×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.