Skip to content

Microsoft MSFT EV / EBITDA

EV / EBITDA at other companies

International Business Machines logo
International Business MachinesIBM
16.7×-7.1×
Apple logo
AppleAAPL
23.5×-1.0×
Electronic Arts logo
Electronic ArtsEA
32.7×
PTC logo
PTCPTC
14.2×-13.0×
Take-Two Interactive Software logo
Take-Two Interactive SoftwareTTWO
32.3×
Amazon logo
AmazonAMZN
16.3×-0.3×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$82.9B+18.3%
Gross profit$56.1B+16.4%
Operating income$38.4B+20.0%
Net income$31.8B+23.1%
EPS (diluted)$4.27+23.4%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$32.1B+11.4%
Total debt$125.43B+19.4%
Total equity$414.37B+28.7%
Total assets$694.23B+23.4%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$46.7B+26.0%
CapEx$30.9B+84.4%
Free cash flow$15.8B-22.2%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$2.81T-1.5%
Enterprise value$2.91T-0.9%
P/E22.5×-7.1×
P/S8.8×-1.7×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin68.3%-0.8pp
Operating margin46.8%+1.6pp
Net margin39.3%+3.6pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity34%+0.4pp
Debt / equity0.3×0.0×
Current ratio1.3×-0.1×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Microsoft’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Microsoft’s 10-Q, filed April 29, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Microsoft's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Microsoft's EV / EBITDA?
Microsoft (MSFT) reported EV / EBITDA of 14.5× in Q1 2026.
How has Microsoft's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Microsoft's EV / EBITDA decreased by 24.3% year-over-year, from 19.2× to 14.5×.
What is the long-term trend for Microsoft's EV / EBITDA?
Over 4 years (2021 to 2025), Microsoft's EV / EBITDA has grown at a -2.6% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 98× to 88.1×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.