Skip to content

EV / EBITDA at other companies

Automatic Data Processing, Inc. logo
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.ADP
12.4×-7.7×
Marsh logo
MarshMRSH
15.1×
Brown & Brown logo
Brown & BrownBRO
14.6×-8.6×
Aon plc logo
Aon plcAON
17.4×-8.4×
Arthur J. Gallagher logo
Arthur J. GallagherAJG
17.6×-8.1×
Cognizant logo
CognizantCTSH
7.4×-2.9×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$2.4B+8.5%
Operating income$448.0M+3.7%
Net income$297.0M+26.4%
EPS (diluted)$3.10+33.1%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$1.9B+23.1%
Total debt$6.9B+16.5%
Total equity$8.0B-1.9%
Total assets$29.6B+5.6%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow-$10.0M+71.4%
CapEx$55.0M+7.8%
Free cash flow-$65.0M+24.4%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$24.56B-18.5%
Enterprise value$29.61B-14.7%
P/E14.7×
P/S2.5×-0.6×

Profitability

See full
Operating margin22.7%+14.8pp
Net margin16.8%

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity20.7%
Debt / equity0.9×+0.1×
Current ratio1.2×0.0×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Willis Towers Watson’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Willis Towers Watson’s 10-Q, filed April 30, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Willis Towers Watson's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Willis Towers Watson's EV / EBITDA?
Willis Towers Watson (WTW) reported EV / EBITDA of 12.1× in Q1 2026.
How has Willis Towers Watson's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Willis Towers Watson's EV / EBITDA decreased by 61.1% year-over-year, from 31.2× to 12.1×.
What is the long-term trend for Willis Towers Watson's EV / EBITDA?
Over 4 years (2021 to 2025), Willis Towers Watson's EV / EBITDA has grown at a 8.5% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 60.9× to 84.3×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.