Skip to content

EV / EBITDA at other companies

Marsh logo
MarshMRSH
15.1×
Brown & Brown logo
Brown & BrownBRO
14.6×-8.6×
Aon plc logo
Aon plcAON
17.4×-8.4×
Willis Towers Watson logo
Willis Towers WatsonWTW
12.1×-19.1×
American International Group logo
American International GroupAIG
7.1×+0.3×
W.R. Berkley logo
W.R. BerkleyWRB
9.6×-1.7×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$4.8B+27.7%
Net income$822.0M+16.8%
EPS (diluted)$3.16+16.2%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$1.4B-91.5%
Total debt$14.0B+5.7%
Total equity$23.8B+6.5%
Total assets$78.3B+5.7%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$957.0M+9.8%
CapEx$36.0M+28.6%
Free cash flow$921.0M+9.1%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$55.52B-37.0%
Enterprise value$68.12B-19.6%
P/E34.5×-22.1×
P/S3.7×-3.6×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin99.7%+14.0pp
Net margin10.8%-2.2pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity7%-2.3pp
Debt / equity0.6×0.0×
Current ratio1.1×-0.4×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Arthur J. Gallagher’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Arthur J. Gallagher’s 10-Q, filed May 7, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Arthur J. Gallagher's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Arthur J. Gallagher's EV / EBITDA?
Arthur J. Gallagher (AJG) reported EV / EBITDA of 17.6× in Q1 2026.
How has Arthur J. Gallagher's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Arthur J. Gallagher's EV / EBITDA decreased by 31.5% year-over-year, from 25.6× to 17.6×.
What is the long-term trend for Arthur J. Gallagher's EV / EBITDA?
Over 4 years (2021 to 2025), Arthur J. Gallagher's EV / EBITDA has grown at a 5.3% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 78.9× to 97×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.