Skip to content

EV / EBITDA at other companies

McDonald's logo
McDonald'sMCD
20.9×-1.8×
Starbucks logo
StarbucksSBUX
26.8×+5.2×
Yum! Brands logo
Yum! BrandsYUM
15.6×-1.2×
Sysco logo
SyscoSYY
12×-0.1×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$2.3B+7.4%
Operating income$606.0M+39.3%
Net income$445.0M+101%
EPS (diluted)$0.97+98.0%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$1.0B+12.6%
Total debt$15.6B-1.5%
Total equity$3.7B+20.1%
Total assets$24.9B

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$227.0M+92.4%
CapEx$58.0M-9.4%
Free cash flow$169.0M+213%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$25.48B+18.2%
Enterprise value$40.12B+9.8%
P/E19.6×+3.5×
P/S2.7×+0.2×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin65.3%+0.9pp
Operating margin24.7%-1.6pp
Net margin13.5%-1.7pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity37.9%-6.1pp
Debt / equity4.2×-0.9×
Current ratio0.0×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Restaurant Brands International’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Restaurant Brands International’s 10-Q, filed May 6, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Restaurant Brands International's ev / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Restaurant Brands International's EV / EBITDA?
Restaurant Brands International (QSR) reported EV / EBITDA of 15× in Q1 2026.
How has Restaurant Brands International's EV / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Restaurant Brands International's EV / EBITDA increased by 6.3% year-over-year, from 14.1× to 15×.
What is the long-term trend for Restaurant Brands International's EV / EBITDA?
Over 4 years (2021 to 2025), Restaurant Brands International's EV / EBITDA has grown at a -4.9% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 71.5× to 58.4×.
What does EV / EBITDA mean?
What the whole business (debt included) costs relative to its operating cash earnings.
How do you interpret EV / EBITDA?
Lets you compare companies with different leverage and tax positions on a like-for-like basis — the standard multiple in M&A. Lower can mean cheaper, subject to growth and capital intensity.
How does EV / EBITDA compare across companies?
Broadly comparable across non-financial sectors; not used for banks and insurers, where EBITDA is not meaningful.