Skip to content

Net debt / EBITDA at other companies

McDonald's logo
McDonald'sMCD
4.1×-0.2×
Starbucks logo
StarbucksSBUX
4.9×+1.2×
Yum! Brands logo
Yum! BrandsYUM
0.8×+0.7×
Sysco logo
SyscoSYY
3.4×+0.2×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$2.3B+7.4%
Operating income$606.0M+39.3%
Net income$445.0M+101%
EPS (diluted)$0.97+98.0%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$1.0B+12.6%
Total debt$15.6B-1.5%
Total equity$3.7B+20.1%
Total assets$24.9B

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$227.0M+92.4%
CapEx$58.0M-9.4%
Free cash flow$169.0M+213%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$25.48B+18.2%
Enterprise value$40.12B+9.8%
P/E19.6×+3.5×
P/S2.7×+0.2×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin65.3%+0.9pp
Operating margin24.7%-1.6pp
Net margin13.5%-1.7pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity37.9%-6.1pp
Debt / equity4.2×-0.9×
Current ratio0.0×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Restaurant Brands International’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Restaurant Brands International’s 10-Q, filed May 6, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Restaurant Brands International's net debt / ebitda.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Restaurant Brands International's net debt / EBITDA?
Restaurant Brands International (QSR) reported net debt / EBITDA of 5.5× in Q1 2026.
How has Restaurant Brands International's net debt / EBITDA changed year-over-year?
Restaurant Brands International's net debt / EBITDA decreased by 5.4% year-over-year, from 5.8× to 5.5×.
What is the long-term trend for Restaurant Brands International's net debt / EBITDA?
Over 4 years (2021 to 2025), Restaurant Brands International's net debt / EBITDA has grown at a -2.8% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 26.3× to 23.5×.
What does net debt / EBITDA mean?
How many years of operating earnings it would take to pay off the company's net debt.
How do you interpret net debt / EBITDA?
Lower is safer; lenders often covenant around 3–4×. A negative value means net cash (more cash than debt), a position of strength. Spikes can reflect a temporary EBITDA dip rather than new borrowing.
How does net debt / EBITDA compare across companies?
A standard leverage yardstick across non-financial sectors; covenant thresholds vary by industry cash-flow stability.