Skip to content

SiriusPoint SPNT Property Catastrophe — Year 3

Other product segments

Other Specialties
56.1%+113%
Property Other
41.4%+40.8%
Casualty
23.4%+5.9%
Other
15.8%-0.6%
A&H
6.5%+3.2%

Similar metrics at other companies

Arch Capital Group logo
ACGLProperty catastrophe — Year Three
-23.8%+1.5pp
Arch Capital Group logo
ACGLProperty excluding property catastrophe — Year Three
14.5%-0.2pp
American Financial Group logo
AFGProperty and casualty insurance — Year 3
15.2%-0.2pp
Everest Group logo
EGProperty Insurance — Year three
24.2%+1.7pp
The Hartford Financial Services Group logo
HIGProperty Insurance — 3rd Year
9.4%-0.1pp
Arch Capital Group logo
ACGLProperty catastrophe — Year Four
138.8%-75.1pp

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$774.6M+6.5%
Net income$102.2M+65.9%
EPS (diluted)$0.82+67.3%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$1.0B+9.2%
Total debt$702.9M+2.2%
Total equity$2.3B+13.7%
Total assets$12.5B+1.6%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$141.9M+260%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$2.78B+25.6%
Enterprise value$2.47B+25.1%
P/E5.6×-6.5×
P/S0.9×0.0×

Profitability

See full
Net margin15.4%+8.4pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity23.1%+15.2pp
Debt / equity0.3×0.0×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by SiriusPoint in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept us-gaap:ShortdurationInsuranceContractsHistoricalClaimsDurationYearThree.

The official record: SiriusPoint’s 10-K, filed February 24, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about SiriusPoint's property catastrophe — year 3.

Connect your AI assistant and compare segments, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is SiriusPoint's property catastrophe — year 3?
SiriusPoint (SPNT) reported property catastrophe — year 3 of 44.1% in Q4 2025.
What does property catastrophe — year 3 mean?
Represents the loss development or reserve status for the property catastrophe segment during the third year following the inception of the underwriting period. This metric provides a more mature view of claim settlement patterns and reserve adequacy. It is used to validate the long-term accuracy of initial actuarial assumptions for the portfolio.