Boise Cascade BCC Net Periodic Defined Benefits Expense Reversal Of Expense Excluding Service Cost Component
Net Periodic Defined Benefits Expense Reversal Of Expense Excluding Service Cost Component at other companies
Other financials
Where this comes from
Reported directly by Boise Cascade in its filing.
Tagged under the XBRL concept us-gaap:NetPeriodicDefinedBenefitsExpenseReversalOfExpenseExcludingServiceCostComponent.
The official record: Boise Cascade’s 10-Q, filed May 4, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →
Ask your AI about Boise Cascade's net periodic defined benefits expense reversal of expense excluding service cost component.
Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.
Connect your AI
Claude
Questions, answered.
- What is Boise Cascade's net periodic defined benefits expense reversal of expense excluding service cost component?
- Boise Cascade (BCC) reported net periodic defined benefits expense reversal of expense excluding service cost component of $30K in Q1 2026.
- How has Boise Cascade's net periodic defined benefits expense reversal of expense excluding service cost component changed year-over-year?
- Boise Cascade's net periodic defined benefits expense reversal of expense excluding service cost component decreased by 9.1% year-over-year, from $33K to $30K.
- What is the long-term trend for Boise Cascade's net periodic defined benefits expense reversal of expense excluding service cost component?
- Over 4 years (2021 to 2025), Boise Cascade's net periodic defined benefits expense reversal of expense excluding service cost component has grown at a 14.6% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from $76K to $131K.
- What does net periodic defined benefits expense reversal of expense excluding service cost component mean?
- This metric captures the non-service cost components of defined benefit pension plans, such as interest costs, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of actuarial gains or losses. It reflects the financial impact of pension obligations that are independent of the current workforce's service. Changes in this metric can indicate shifts in long-term pension liability management and actuarial assumptions.