Peabody Energy BTU Business Segments
| TTM Q1 '26 | TTM Q4 '25 | TTM Q3 '25 | TTM Q2 '25 | TTM Q1 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue by Business | ||||||
| Corporate and Other (1) | $67.4M+20.1% | $56.1M+15.0% | $48.8M+16.2% | $42M-9.3% | $46.3M+1.1% | |
| Powder River Basin | $1.17B+1.2% | $1.15B-1.5% | $1.17B-0.3% | $1.17B+4.8% | $1.12B+2.0% | |
| Seaborne Metallurgical | $1.1B+6.1% | $1.04B+3.3% | $1B+1.7% | $986.6M-4.1% | $1.03B-2.5% | |
| Seaborne Thermal | $840.9M-7.4% | $908.5M-10.2% | $1.01B-6.5% | $1.08B-9.4% | $1.2B-1.5% | |
| Total Assets by Business | ||||||
| Corporate and Other (1) | $7.8B-2.3% | $7.98B-2.2% | $8.16B— | —— | —— | |
| Sales related costs by Business | ||||||
| Powder River Basin | $269.6M-4.1% | $281.1M-6.4% | $300.3M-5.1% | $316.6M+4.5% | $303M+1.8% | |
| Seaborne Metallurgical | $253.2M+6.3% | $238.2M+2.0% | $233.5M+1.4% | $230.3M-1.4% | $233.6M+0.9% | |
| Seaborne Thermal | $181.2M-7.7% | $196.3M-8.8% | $215.2M-1.7% | $219M-3.4% | $226.8M+1.1% | |
| Other expenses by Business | ||||||
| Powder River Basin | $50.1M+6.8% | $46.9M+1.3% | $46.3M-3.7% | $48.1M+1.9% | $47.2M+11.1% | |
| Seaborne Metallurgical | -$108.3M+4.5% | -$113.4M-18.0% | -$96.1M-6.7% | -$90.1M+46.8% | -$169.5M-20.6% | |
| Commodities expense by Business | ||||||
| Powder River Basin | $173M+7.6% | $160.8M+1.7% | $158.1M+0.4% | $157.5M+0.9% | $156.1M-1.5% | |
| Seaborne Metallurgical | $58.5M-0.3% | $58.7M+4.3% | $56.3M+4.3% | $54M-5.8% | $57.3M-3.9% | |
| Seaborne Thermal | $82.6M+2.5% | $80.6M+2.3% | $78.8M-3.0% | $81.2M-3.1% | $83.8M-5.4% | |
| Additions to property, plant, equipment and mine development by Business | ||||||
| Corporate and Other (1) | $6.1M+19.6% | $5.1M-19.0% | $6.3M-14.9% | $7.4M-6.3% | $7.9M0.0% | |
| Powder River Basin | $44.6M+34.7% | $33.1M-1.5% | $33.6M+5.3% | $31.9M-5.9% | $33.9M-3.1% | |
| Seaborne Metallurgical | $311.2M+0.6% | $309.4M+2.9% | $300.8M+8.4% | $277.5M-1.0% | $280.4M+5.2% | |
| Seaborne Thermal | $39.9M+0.3% | $39.8M-19.4% | $49.4M-15.7% | $58.6M-12.8% | $67.2M-8.2% | |
| Outside services by Business | ||||||
| Powder River Basin | $137.5M+5.5% | $130.3M+1.6% | $128.3M+2.5% | $125.2M+2.3% | $122.4M-0.6% | |
| Seaborne Metallurgical | $384.5M+8.3% | $355M+7.3% | $330.9M+7.6% | $307.5M+11.3% | $276.4M+6.8% | |
| Seaborne Thermal | $107.9M-3.2% | $111.5M-3.8% | $115.9M-3.5% | $120.1M-3.5% | $124.5M-3.3% | |
| Labor costs by Business | ||||||
| Powder River Basin | $223M+4.8% | $212.7M-0.5% | $213.8M+2.7% | $208.2M+1.7% | $204.8M-1.0% | |
| Seaborne Metallurgical | $262.3M+6.6% | $246.1M+4.5% | $235.6M+3.7% | $227.3M+4.1% | $218.4M+2.7% | |
| Seaborne Thermal | $140.9M+0.4% | $140.3M-5.1% | $147.9M-2.0% | $150.9M-2.4% | $154.6M-1.7% | |
| Repair costs by Business | ||||||
| Powder River Basin | $150.5M+3.5% | $145.4M+4.1% | $139.7M+3.6% | $134.8M+5.1% | $128.3M-2.6% | |
| Seaborne Metallurgical | $213.1M+8.9% | $195.6M+3.9% | $188.2M-7.3% | $203M-1.0% | $205.1M+7.5% | |
| Seaborne Thermal | $117.6M+4.1% | $113M-3.7% | $117.4M-11.5% | $132.7M-5.0% | $139.7M-8.6% | |
| Revenue by Product | ||||||
| Metallurgical coal | $1.1B+6.0% | $1.03B+3.4% | $1B+1.8% | $983.1M-4.1% | $1.03B-2.3% | |
| Thermal coal | $2.73B-1.4% | $2.77B-4.2% | $2.89B-3.1% | $2.98B-3.4% | $3.09B-0.2% |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- How does Peabody Energy break its business down?
- Peabody Energy (BTU) reports revenue by business across 5 parts — Corporate and Other (1), Other U.S.Thermal Mining, Powder River Basin, Seaborne Metallurgical and Seaborne Thermal. Each is extracted from the segment footnotes and tracked over time.
- Where does Peabody Energy's segment data come from?
- Segment breakdowns are pulled from the segment footnotes in Peabody Energy's SEC filings (the XBRL dimensional tags), so every line ties back to a reported figure. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any segment for its full history.