Peabody Energy BTU Business Segments
| TTM Q1 '26 | TTM Q4 '25 | TTM Q3 '25 | TTM Q2 '25 | TTM Q1 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue by Business | ||||||
| Corporate and Other (1) | $67.4M+45.6% | $56.1M+22.5% | $48.8M-15.1% | $42M+3.7% | $46.3M-24.6% | |
| Powder River Basin | $1.17B+4.2% | $1.15B+4.9% | $1.17B+6.2% | $1.17B+5.9% | $1.12B-2.3% | |
| Seaborne Metallurgical | $1.1B+6.9% | $1.04B-1.8% | $1B-14.8% | $986.6M-16.6% | $1.03B-18.4% | |
| Seaborne Thermal | $840.9M-29.6% | $908.5M-25.2% | $1.01B-15.0% | $1.08B-7.9% | $1.2B-5.7% | |
| Total Assets by Business | ||||||
| Corporate and Other (1) | $7.8B— | $7.98B— | $8.16B— | —— | —— | |
| Sales related costs by Business | ||||||
| Powder River Basin | $269.6M-11.0% | $281.1M-5.5% | $300.3M+0.7% | $316.6M+5.2% | $303M-7.1% | |
| Seaborne Metallurgical | $253.2M+8.4% | $238.2M+2.8% | $233.5M+0.8% | $230.3M-5.4% | $233.6M-5.1% | |
| Seaborne Thermal | $181.2M-20.1% | $196.3M-12.5% | $215.2M+0.4% | $219M+5.1% | $226.8M+9.2% | |
| Other expenses by Business | ||||||
| Powder River Basin | $50.1M+6.1% | $46.9M+10.4% | $46.3M+29.4% | $48.1M+59.5% | $47.2M+60.4% | |
| Seaborne Metallurgical | -$108.3M+36.1% | -$113.4M+19.3% | -$96.1M+26.6% | -$90.1M-7.8% | -$169.5M-2,810% | |
| Commodities expense by Business | ||||||
| Powder River Basin | $173M+10.8% | $160.8M+1.5% | $158.1M-2.6% | $157.5M-4.9% | $156.1M-11.4% | |
| Seaborne Metallurgical | $58.5M+2.1% | $58.7M-1.5% | $56.3M-8.9% | $54M-13.4% | $57.3M-7.3% | |
| Seaborne Thermal | $82.6M-1.4% | $80.6M-9.0% | $78.8M-15.9% | $81.2M-14.4% | $83.8M-13.3% | |
| Additions to property, plant, equipment and mine development by Business | ||||||
| Corporate and Other (1) | $6.1M-22.8% | $5.1M-35.4% | $6.3M-2.3% | $7.4M+2.8% | $7.9M-9.7% | |
| Powder River Basin | $44.6M+31.6% | $33.1M-5.4% | $33.6M+3.3% | $31.9M-3.2% | $33.9M-5.0% | |
| Seaborne Metallurgical | $311.2M+11.0% | $309.4M+16.1% | $300.8M+32.9% | $277.5M+33.2% | $280.4M+56.5% | |
| Seaborne Thermal | $39.9M-40.6% | $39.8M-45.6% | $49.4M-24.7% | $58.6M-8.0% | $67.2M+10.2% | |
| Outside services by Business | ||||||
| Powder River Basin | $137.5M+12.3% | $130.3M+5.8% | $128.3M+3.2% | $125.2M-1.3% | $122.4M-9.6% | |
| Seaborne Metallurgical | $384.5M+39.1% | $355M+37.1% | $330.9M+39.3% | $307.5M+45.1% | $276.4M+32.6% | |
| Seaborne Thermal | $107.9M-13.3% | $111.5M-13.4% | $115.9M-9.7% | $120.1M-2.9% | $124.5M+1.2% | |
| Labor costs by Business | ||||||
| Powder River Basin | $223M+8.9% | $212.7M+2.9% | $213.8M+5.6% | $208.2M+3.1% | $204.8M+1.1% | |
| Seaborne Metallurgical | $262.3M+20.1% | $246.1M+15.7% | $235.6M+16.3% | $227.3M+16.4% | $218.4M+15.1% | |
| Seaborne Thermal | $140.9M-8.9% | $140.3M-10.8% | $147.9M-4.6% | $150.9M-1.7% | $154.6M+3.5% | |
| Repair costs by Business | ||||||
| Powder River Basin | $150.5M+17.3% | $145.4M+10.4% | $139.7M+4.5% | $134.8M-2.6% | $128.3M-15.1% | |
| Seaborne Metallurgical | $213.1M+3.9% | $195.6M+2.5% | $188.2M+6.1% | $203M+33.7% | $205.1M+40.3% | |
| Seaborne Thermal | $117.6M-15.8% | $113M-26.0% | $117.4M-25.3% | $132.7M-12.2% | $139.7M-9.1% | |
| Revenue by Product | ||||||
| Metallurgical coal | $1.1B+7.0% | $1.03B-1.4% | $1B-14.7% | $983.1M-16.6% | $1.03B-18.4% | |
| Thermal coal | $2.73B-11.5% | $2.77B-10.5% | $2.89B-5.9% | $2.98B-3.1% | $3.09B-3.8% |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- How does Peabody Energy break its business down?
- Peabody Energy (BTU) reports revenue by business across 5 parts — Corporate and Other (1), Other U.S.Thermal Mining, Powder River Basin, Seaborne Metallurgical and Seaborne Thermal. Each is extracted from the segment footnotes and tracked over time.
- Where does Peabody Energy's segment data come from?
- Segment breakdowns are pulled from the segment footnotes in Peabody Energy's SEC filings (the XBRL dimensional tags), so every line ties back to a reported figure. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any segment for its full history.
