Skip to content

Clearfield CLFD Ratios & Valuation

FY'25FY'24FY'23FY'22
Profitability
Gross margin36.9%+16.3pp20.6%-14.8pp35.4%-6.3pp41.7%-1.8pp
Operating margin4%+20.1pp-16.1%-32.7pp16.6%-6.9pp23.6%+5.6pp
Net margin-5.8%+4.1pp-9.9%-24.3pp14.4%-3.8pp18.2%+3.8pp
EBITDA margin8.1%+19.5pp-11.4%-30.0pp18.7%-6.2pp24.8%+5.3pp
Free cash flow margin15.8%4.9%
Returns
Return on equity-3%+1.2pp-4.2%-18.3pp14.1%-25.2pp39.3%+17.5pp
Return on assets-2.6%+1.1pp-3.7%-14.8pp11.1%-16.7pp27.8%+9.4pp
Return on invested capital1.6%+8.6pp-7%-20.1pp13%-25.5pp38.5%+13.9pp
Efficiency
Asset turnover0.4×+0.1×0.4×-0.4×0.8×-0.8×1.5×+0.3×
Inventory turnover1.8×+0.5×1.3×-0.3×1.6×-1.3×2.9×-0.9×
Liquidity
Current ratio5.4×-4.0×9.4×-0.8×10.2×+7.1×3.1×-0.4×
Quick ratio4.3×-2.9×7.1×+0.3×6.8×+5.3×1.5×-0.6×
Cash ratio0.6×0.0×0.6×-0.7×1.3×+1.0×0.3×-0.3×
Leverage
Debt-to-equity0.0×0.1×0.0×0.1×-0.2×0.2×+0.2×
Debt-to-assets0.0×0.1×0.0×-0.1×0.1×+0.1×
Net debt / EBITDA-1.1×-0.5×-0.7×0.2×+0.6×
Per Share
Book value per share$18.31-3.2%$18.91-9.9%$20.99+97.8%$10.61+40.9%
Valuation
Market capitalization$511.37M-7.6%$555.17M+26.9%$437.32M-70.5%$1.48B+144%
Enterprise value$512.91M-5.9%$559.38M+34.5%$415.97M-72.2%$1.5B+151%
Price / sales3.8×-0.7×4.4×+2.5×1.9×-3.5×5.5×+1.2×
Price / book2.1×0.0×+0.6×1.4×-8.7×10×+4.2×
EV / EBITDA69.3×-108×9.9×-12.4×22.3×+0.6×
EV / sales3.8×-0.6×4.5×+2.6×1.8×-3.7×5.5×+1.3×
Free cash flow yield2%-1.7pp2.5%
Earnings yield-1.7%-1.3pp-2.2%-9.7pp7.4%+4.1pp3.3%0.0pp

Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.

Compare these in charts →

Questions, answered.

What are Clearfield's profit margins?
Clearfield (CLFD) runs a 37.2% gross margin and a 1.4% operating margin, with a -6.3% net margin.
Where do Clearfield's ratios come from?
Every ratio is computed from Clearfield's SEC filings — trailing-twelve-month flows over period-end balances. Valuation multiples combine those fundamentals with market data, recomputed each period. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any ratio for its full history and peer comparisons.