Climb Global Solutions, Inc. CLMB Business Combination Contingent Consideration Arrangements Change In Amount Of Contingent Consideration Liability1
Business Combination Contingent Consideration Arrangements Change In Amount Of Contingent Consideration Liability1 at other companies
Other financials
Where this comes from
Reported directly by Climb Global Solutions, Inc. in its filing.
Tagged under the XBRL concept us-gaap:BusinessCombinationContingentConsiderationArrangementsChangeInAmountOfContingentConsiderationLiability1.
The official record: Climb Global Solutions, Inc.’s 10-K, filed February 27, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →
Ask your AI about Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s business combination contingent consideration arrangements change in amount of contingent consideration liability1.
Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.
Connect your AI
Claude
Questions, answered.
- What is Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s business combination contingent consideration arrangements change in amount of contingent consideration liability1?
- Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) reported business combination contingent consideration arrangements change in amount of contingent consideration liability1 of $343.5K in Q4 2025.
- How has Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s business combination contingent consideration arrangements change in amount of contingent consideration liability1 changed year-over-year?
- Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s business combination contingent consideration arrangements change in amount of contingent consideration liability1 decreased by 62.0% year-over-year, from $904.5K to $343.5K.
- What does business combination contingent consideration arrangements change in amount of contingent consideration liability1 mean?
- This metric reflects the periodic adjustments to the fair value of liabilities associated with earn-outs or performance-based payments promised to sellers in an acquisition. Changes in this liability indicate whether the acquired business is performing above or below the initial expectations set at the time of the transaction. It serves as a key indicator of the accuracy of management's acquisition forecasting and the underlying health of the integrated business units.