Designer Brands DBI Business Segments
| FY'25 | FY'24 | FY'23 | FY'22 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Sales by Business | |||||
| Brand Portfolio | $362.86M-9.0% | $398.88M+14.3% | $348.98M+6.5% | $327.72M+14.6% | |
| Segment operating profit by Business | |||||
| Brand Portfolio | $10.26M— | —— | -$26.72M-16.7% | -$22.9M— | |
| Cost of Revenue by Business | |||||
| Brand Portfolio | $260.72M-9.8% | $289.07M+12.7% | $256.43M+0.3% | $255.71M— | |
| Income from equity investments by Business | |||||
| Brand Portfolio | $11.03M-16.1% | $13.15M+40.0% | $9.39M+5.9% | $8.86M— | |
| Selling Expense by Business | |||||
| Brand Portfolio | $0— | $0— | $0— | $0— | |
| Marketing Expense by Business | |||||
| Brand Portfolio | $14.64M-37.0% | $23.25M-16.9% | $27.99M+41.4% | $19.79M— | |
| Occupancy, Net by Business | |||||
| Brand Portfolio | $4.74M-21.2% | $6.02M-21.9% | $7.71M-17.2% | $9.32M— | |
| Cash paid for segment property and equipment by Business | |||||
| Brand Portfolio | $2.04M-15.6% | $2.41M+9.2% | $2.21M+47.3% | $1.5M— | |
| Other General Expense by Business | |||||
| Brand Portfolio | $18.3M-9.6% | $20.25M-8.7% | $22.17M+134% | $9.46M— | |
| D&A by Business | |||||
| Brand Portfolio | $7.12M+4.6% | $6.81M-12.8% | $7.81M+42.5% | $5.48M+4.1% | |
| Other Labor-related Expenses by Business | |||||
| Brand Portfolio | $45.5M-8.9% | $49.95M+4.8% | $47.67M+15.3% | $41.35M— | |
| Production and Distribution Costs by Business | |||||
| Brand Portfolio | $12.6M-6.3% | $13.45M-12.1% | $15.31M-16.7% | $18.37M— | |
| Net Sales by Product | |||||
| Accessories and other | $174.05M+16.1% | $149.89M+2.0% | $146.92M-12.2% | $167.39M+11.7% | |
| Athletic Footwear | $785M-3.0% | $809.02M+12.8% | $717.46M-7.3% | $774.37M— | |
| Commission income | $63.32M-23.2% | $82.42M-10.6% | $92.22M+144% | $37.84M+114% | |
| Kids' footwear | $112.87M-6.1% | $120.2M— | —— | —— | |
| Men's footwear | $365.75M-2.7% | $376.05M— | —— | —— | |
| Wholesale | $313.02M-6.7% | $335.59M+23.5% | $271.66M-1.9% | $276.89M+15.1% | |
| Women's footwear | $1.22B-5.8% | $1.29B-8.1% | $1.41B-10.5% | $1.57B-16.8% | |
| Net Sales by Geography | |||||
| Canada | $293.27M-2.2% | $299.82M+6.2% | $282.38M— | —— | |
| United States | $2.6B-4.1% | $2.71B-3.0% | $2.79B— | —— | |
| State and Local by Geography | |||||
| California | -$2.29M— | $0-100% | $941K— | —— | |
| City of Columbus, Ohio | $0— | $0-100% | $1.01M— | —— | |
| New York | $0— | $0+100% | -$2.53M— | —— |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- How does Designer Brands break its business down?
- Designer Brands (DBI) reports net sales by business across 2 parts — Brand Portfolio and Retail. Each is extracted from the segment footnotes and tracked over time.
- Where does Designer Brands's segment data come from?
- Segment breakdowns are pulled from the segment footnotes in Designer Brands's SEC filings (the XBRL dimensional tags), so every line ties back to a reported figure. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any segment for its full history.
