Equity Residential EQR Business Segments
| TTM Q1 '26 | TTM Q4 '25 | TTM Q3 '25 | TTM Q2 '25 | TTM Q1 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Lease Lease Income by Product | ||||||
| Other Rental Income | $102.01M-2.9% | $103.05M-3.1% | $105.06M+22.5% | $104.12M+14.2% | $105.06M+8.5% | |
| Other Revenue | $58.79M-3.6% | $59.8M-3.9% | $61.41M+32.4% | $60.21M+13.6% | $60.99M+2.5% | |
| Parking Revenue | $43.22M-1.9% | $43.25M-1.9% | $43.65M+0.7% | $43.92M+4.2% | $44.08M+6.7% | |
| Operating Lease Lease Income Loss by Product | ||||||
| Other Lease Revenue | $15.48M+2,314% | $11.61M+334% | $7.99M— | $3.09M— | -$699K— | |
| Parking | $49.07M+0.6% | $49.22M+2.2% | $49.24M+4.8% | $49.11M+6.6% | $48.76M+7.9% | |
| Residential And Non Residential Rent | $2.84B+2.9% | $2.83B+3.2% | $2.81B+3.8% | $2.79B+3.7% | $2.76B+3.3% | |
| Utility Recoveries | $106.68M+10.5% | $105.18M+11.9% | $102.88M+12.6% | $99.52M+10.3% | $96.58M+8.7% | |
| Net Operating Income Loss From Rental Real Estate by Geography | ||||||
| Boston | $222.04M-1.3% | $222.53M-1.8% | $223.51M-2.8% | $224.83M-1.6% | $224.92M-0.7% | |
| Denver | $56.28M-6.2% | $57.9M+5.2% | $58.75M+8.9% | $59.3M+9.2% | $59.99M+13.6% | |
| Los Angeles | $324.29M0.0% | $325.14M0.0% | $324.61M-2.2% | $323.85M-2.3% | $324.35M-1.2% | |
| Non Same Store | $116.52M+147% | $102.99M+122% | $92.11M+242% | $70.33M+255% | $47.22M+124% | |
| Orange County | $100.26M+2.9% | $99.72M+2.8% | $98.7M+1.6% | $98.15M+1.4% | $97.41M+1.6% | |
| Same And Non-Same Store | $2.07B+5.7% | $2.05B+5.6% | $2.03B+4.9% | $1.99B+4.0% | $1.96B+3.1% | |
| San Diego | $66.74M+1.7% | $66.58M+1.7% | $66.27M+3.1% | $65.82M-2.4% | $65.64M-6.1% | |
| San Francisco | $330.24M+6.7% | $323.66M+6.1% | $318.15M+5.6% | $312.64M+4.2% | $309.57M+4.2% | |
| Seattle | $190.1M+2.1% | $190.51M+1.1% | $189M-0.8% | $187.27M-3.3% | $186.21M-5.5% | |
| Southern California | $491.29M+0.8% | $491.44M+0.8% | $489.57M-0.7% | $487.82M-1.6% | $487.41M-1.3% | |
| Operating Lease Lease Income by Geography | ||||||
| Boston | $320.85M+0.9% | $319.5M+0.3% | $319.23M-1.2% | $318.69M-0.9% | $317.85M-0.2% | |
| Denver | $82.19M-4.7% | $83.63M+6.1% | $84.7M+9.9% | $85.47M+10.7% | $86.21M+14.7% | |
| Los Angeles | $475.81M+1.4% | $474.87M+1.1% | $472.72M-1.1% | $470.52M-1.3% | $469.09M-0.8% | |
| Non Same Store | $186.4M+150% | $164.86M+125% | $145.04M+226% | $110.46M+213% | $74.44M+96.5% | |
| Orange County | $129.12M+2.5% | $128.46M+2.6% | $127.48M+2.2% | $126.75M+2.2% | $125.96M+2.5% | |
| Same And Non-Same Store | $3.06B+6.5% | $3.03B+6.3% | $2.99B+5.3% | $2.93B+4.4% | $2.88B+3.1% | |
| San Diego | $85.57M+2.5% | $85.3M+2.7% | $84.74M+4.8% | $84.06M-1.4% | $83.52M-6.4% | |
| San Francisco | $466.04M+5.7% | $458.89M+5.4% | $452.45M+5.3% | $445.99M+4.3% | $441.04M+3.6% | |
| Seattle | $265.85M+2.4% | $265.04M+0.7% | $263.14M-1.2% | $260.92M-3.6% | $259.57M-5.7% | |
| Southern California | $690.5M+1.8% | $688.63M+1.6% | $684.94M+0.2% | $681.33M-0.7% | $678.57M-0.9% | |
| Operating Expenses by Geography | ||||||
| Boston | $98.81M+6.3% | $96.97M+5.5% | $95.72M+2.9% | $93.86M+0.8% | $92.94M+1.1% | |
| Denver | $25.91M-1.2% | $25.73M+8.1% | $25.95M+12.2% | $26.17M+14.1% | $26.22M+17.3% | |
| Los Angeles | $151.52M+4.7% | $149.73M+3.5% | $148.11M+1.3% | $146.66M+1.1% | $144.74M+0.2% | |
| Non Same Store | $69.88M+157% | $61.87M+131% | $52.93M+201% | $40.13M+159% | $27.23M+62.3% | |
| Orange County | $28.86M+1.1% | $28.74M+1.9% | $28.78M+4.0% | $28.6M+5.3% | $28.54M+5.9% | |
| Same And Non-Same Store | $995.62M+8.0% | $978.67M+7.8% | $963.62M+6.1% | $942.74M+5.1% | $921.73M+3.1% | |
| San Diego | $18.83M+5.3% | $18.72M+6.6% | $18.48M+11.7% | $18.25M+2.2% | $17.88M-7.5% | |
| San Francisco | $135.8M+3.3% | $135.23M+3.9% | $134.31M+4.5% | $133.35M+4.4% | $131.48M+2.4% | |
| Seattle | $75.75M+3.3% | $74.53M-0.1% | $74.14M-2.1% | $73.64M-4.2% | $73.36M-6.1% | |
| Southern California | $199.22M+4.2% | $197.19M+3.6% | $195.37M+2.6% | $193.51M+1.8% | $191.16M+0.2% |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- How does Equity Residential break its business down?
- Equity Residential (EQR) reports operating lease lease income by product across 3 parts — Other Rental Income, Other Revenue and Parking Revenue. Each is extracted from the segment footnotes and tracked over time.
- Where does Equity Residential's segment data come from?
- Segment breakdowns are pulled from the segment footnotes in Equity Residential's SEC filings (the XBRL dimensional tags), so every line ties back to a reported figure. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any segment for its full history.
