Skip to content

Gran Tierra Energy GTE NGL — Acquisitions

Similar metrics at other companies

Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. logo
PAANGL — Investments in unconsolidated entities
$0
Plains GP Holdings, L.P. logo
PAGPNGL — Investments in unconsolidated entities
$0
Plains GP Holdings, L.P. logo
PAGPNGL — Purchases and related costs
$33M+3.1%
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. logo
PAANGL — Transaction-Related Expenses
$0
BKV logo
BKVNGLs — Revenue
$44.76M+0.2%
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. logo
PAANGL — PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
$365M+0.3%

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$172.1M+2.3%
Net income-$119.2M-518%
EPS (diluted)-$3.38-526%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$134.9M+57.0%
Total debt$639.5M-14.6%
Total equity$108.9M-72.3%
Total assets$1.6B-1.7%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$172.7M+136%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$221M+19.0%
Enterprise value$725.62M-20.6%
P/S0.4×+0.1×

Profitability

See full
Net margin-48.5%

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity-116.6%
Debt / equity5.9×+4.0×
Current ratio0.5×0.0×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by Gran Tierra Energy in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept gte:OilAndGasProvedReserveQuantityVolumeAcquisition.

The official record: Gran Tierra Energy’s 10-K, filed March 4, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Gran Tierra Energy's ngl — acquisitions.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Gran Tierra Energy's NGL — acquisitions?
Gran Tierra Energy (GTE) reported NGL — acquisitions of 0 in Q4 2025.
How has Gran Tierra Energy's NGL — acquisitions changed year-over-year?
Gran Tierra Energy's NGL — acquisitions decreased by 100.0% year-over-year, from 5.5M to 0.
What does NGL — acquisitions mean?
Reflects the volume of NGL reserves added to the company's asset base through the purchase of properties or corporate entities. This metric highlights the company's inorganic growth strategy and its ability to expand its resource footprint through capital allocation. It is used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of external growth compared to organic exploration.