Hasbro HAS Ratios & Valuation
| FY'25 | FY'24 | FY'23 | FY'22 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profitability | |||||
| Gross margin | 72.4%+1.0pp | 71.5%+5.6pp | 65.9%-1.5pp | 67.4%-2.6pp | |
| Operating margin | 0.2%-16.4pp | 16.7%+47.4pp | -30.8%— | —— | |
| EBITDA margin | 3.1%-17.5pp | 20.6%+47.2pp | -26.5%— | —— | |
| Free cash flow margin | 17.7%-0.7pp | 18.4%+6.0pp | 12.4%— | —— | |
| Efficiency | |||||
| Asset turnover | 0.8×+0.1× | 0.6×0.0× | 0.6×0.0× | 0.6×0.0× | |
| Inventory turnover | 4.9×+1.0× | 3.9×+0.5× | 3.4×+0.3× | 3.1×-1.0× | |
| Liquidity | |||||
| Current ratio | 1.4×-0.2× | 1.6×+0.5× | 1.1×-0.2× | 1.4×-0.1× | |
| Quick ratio | 1.2×-0.2× | 1.4×+0.4× | 1×-0.1× | 1.1×-0.2× | |
| Cash ratio | 0.4×-0.1× | 0.5×+0.2× | 0.3×0.0× | 0.2×-0.2× | |
| Leverage | |||||
| Debt-to-assets | 0.6×+0.1× | 0.6×+0.1× | 0.5×0.0× | 0.4×0.0× | |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 17.9×+14.6× | 3.3×— | —— | —— | |
| Interest coverage | 0.1×-4.0× | 4×+12.3× | -8.3×— | —— | |
| Valuation | |||||
| Market capitalization | $11.51B+47.5% | $7.8B+10.1% | $7.09B-15.9% | $8.43B-40.0% | |
| Enterprise value | $14.13B+32.9% | $10.63B+10.1% | $9.66B-18.8% | $11.9B-30.1% | |
| Price / sales | 2.4×+0.6× | 1.9×+0.5× | 1.4×0.0× | 1.4×-0.7× | |
| EV / EBITDA | 96.4×+83.9× | 12.5×— | —— | —— | |
| EV / sales | 3×+0.4× | 2.6×+0.6× | 1.9×-0.1× | 2×-0.6× | |
| Free cash flow yield | 7.2%-2.5pp | 9.7%+1.0pp | 8.7%— | —— | |
| Dividend yield | 3.4%-1.6pp | 5%-0.5pp | 5.5%+0.9pp | 4.6%+1.9pp |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- What are Hasbro's profit margins?
- Hasbro (HAS) runs a 72.4% gross margin and a 2.3% operating margin, with a -12.0% net margin.
- Where do Hasbro's ratios come from?
- Every ratio is computed from Hasbro's SEC filings — trailing-twelve-month flows over period-end balances. Valuation multiples combine those fundamentals with market data, recomputed each period. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any ratio for its full history and peer comparisons.
