Hudson Technologies HDSN Change in fair value of contingent consideration

Change in fair value of contingent consideration at other companies

Great Elm Group, Inc.GEG

$0—

TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.TLSI

-$7.4M-1,003%

Limbach Holdings, Inc.LMB

$149K-65.1%

CareDxCDNA

$0-100%

Commvault SystemsCVLT

$0—

BAE

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.BAER

-$30K+80.3%

Other financials

Income statement

See full

Revenue$60.2M+8.7%

Gross profit$11.8M-1.8%

Operating income$1.5M-52.4%

Net income$330.0K-88.0%

EPS (diluted)$0.01-83.3%

Balance sheet

See full

Cash & equivalents$19.4M-76.1%

Total debt$5.3M-17.9%

Total equity$237.7M-3.7%

Total assets$308.9M+0.3%

Cash flow

See full

Operating cash flow-$12.8M-190%

CapEx$1.1M-23.9%

Free cash flow-$13.9M-209%

Valuation

See full

Market cap$241.47M-26.5%

Enterprise value$227.38M-10.1%

P/E9.4×+0.7×

P/S1×-0.5×

Profitability

See full

Gross margin24.6%-0.2pp

Operating margin15.1%-12.5pp

Net margin12.5%-5.8pp

FCF margin-13.9%-58.4pp

Returns & leverage

See full

Return on equity12.9%-14.1pp

Debt / equity0×0.0×

Current ratio3.4×-0.5×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by Hudson Technologies in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept us-gaap:BusinessCombinationContingentConsiderationArrangementsChangeInAmountOfContingentConsiderationLiability1.

The official record: Hudson Technologies’s 10-K, filed March 16, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Hudson Technologies's change in fair value of contingent consideration.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI

Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Hudson Technologies's change in fair value of contingent consideration?: Hudson Technologies (HDSN) reported change in fair value of contingent consideration of -$400K in Q4 2025.
What does change in fair value of contingent consideration mean?: This metric represents the non-cash adjustment to the fair value of liabilities associated with earn-outs or other contingent payment arrangements from past business acquisitions. Fluctuations in this value reflect changes in management's expectations regarding the achievement of performance targets or other contractual conditions. It serves as an indicator of potential future cash outflows and the accuracy of initial acquisition valuation models.