Skip to content
OpenCapital
Get started

Heritage Financial HFWA Related party deposit liabilities

Related party deposit liabilities at other companies

Independent Bank Corporation logo
Independent Bank CorporationIBCP
$3.4M+127%

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$77.9M+35.3%
Net income$18.9M+36.2%
EPS (diluted)$0.48+20.0%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$268.1M+7.8%
Total debt$20.0M-92.4%
Total equity$1.1B+26.6%
Total assets$8.5B+19.2%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$14.0M-27.4%
CapEx$1.3M+11.2%
Free cash flow$12.7M-29.9%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$1.21B+56.8%
Enterprise value$959.16M+22.1%
P/E16.6×+1.7×
P/S4.5×+1.1×

Profitability

See full
Net margin27.2%+4.5pp
FCF margin30.1%+0.4pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity7.3%+1.3pp
Debt / equity0×-0.3×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by Heritage Financial in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept us-gaap:RelatedPartyDepositLiabilities.

The official record: Heritage Financial’s 10-K, filed February 27, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Heritage Financial's related party deposit liabilities.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Heritage Financial's related party deposit liabilities?
Heritage Financial (HFWA) reported related party deposit liabilities of $4.9M in Q4 2025.
How has Heritage Financial's related party deposit liabilities changed year-over-year?
Heritage Financial's related party deposit liabilities increased by 19.5% year-over-year, from $4.1M to $4.9M.
What is the long-term trend for Heritage Financial's related party deposit liabilities?
Over 5 years (2020 to 2025), Heritage Financial's related party deposit liabilities has grown at a -4.9% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from $6.3M to $4.9M.
What does related party deposit liabilities mean?
The total value of deposit liabilities held by individuals or entities considered related parties to the financial institution, such as directors, officers, or principal shareholders. Monitoring these balances is essential for evaluating potential conflicts of interest and governance transparency.