Skip to content

Jackson Financial JXN Transfers from NAV to Level 3

Transfers from NAV to Level 3 at other companies

Williams Companies logo
Williams CompaniesWMB
$250K
Willis Towers Watson logo
Willis Towers WatsonWTW
$0
Williams Companies logo
Williams CompaniesWMB
$0+100%
Lincoln National logo
Lincoln NationalLNC
$0
General Mills logo
General MillsGIS
$8.58M0.0%
Apollo Global Management logo
Apollo Global ManagementAPO
$1M

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$2.9B-22.6%
Operating income$760.8M
Net income-$424.0M-1,667%
EPS (diluted)-$6.24-1,200%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$5.5B+42.5%
Total debt$2.7B+31.8%
Total equity$9.5B-7.8%
Total assets$339.54B+3.8%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$1.0B-34.4%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$7.45B+22.3%
Enterprise value$4.59B+8.2%
P/S1.3×+0.4×

Profitability

See full
Net margin11.7%

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity5.5%
Debt / equity0.3×+0.1×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by Jackson Financial in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept jxn:FairValueMeasurementWithUnobservableInputsReconciliationRecurringBasisUnobservableAssetTransfersIntoLevel3.

The official record: Jackson Financial’s 10-K, filed February 24, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Jackson Financial's transfers from nav to level 3.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Jackson Financial's transfers from NAV to level 3?
Jackson Financial (JXN) reported transfers from NAV to level 3 of $0 in Q4 2025.
What is the long-term trend for Jackson Financial's transfers from NAV to level 3?
Over 3 years (2022 to 2025), Jackson Financial's transfers from NAV to level 3 has grown at a -100.0% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from $9M to $0.
What does transfers from NAV to level 3 mean?
The fair value of assets reclassified from Net Asset Value (NAV) reporting into Level 3, which requires the use of significant unobservable inputs. This movement suggests that the valuation of these assets has become more complex or less reliant on market-observable data. Investors monitor this to identify potential increases in valuation uncertainty or model-based estimation risk.